Ad is loading...
FFRHX vs RFRCX
FFRHX vs RFRCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFRHX vs. RFRCX commentary
Apr 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFRHX is a Buy and RFRCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFRHX has more cash in the bank: 16B vs. RFRCX (728M). FFRHX pays higher dividends than RFRCX: FFRHX (8.13) vs RFRCX (6.99). FFRHX was incepted earlier than RFRCX: FFRHX (23 years) vs RFRCX (19 years). RFRCX (1.78) is less costly to investors than FFRHX (0.73). RFRCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 80.00 vs. FFRHX (41.00). FFRHX has a lower initial minimum investment than RFRCX: FFRHX (0) vs RFRCX (2000). RFRCX IRA initial investment is lower compared to FFRHX: RFRCX (5000) vs FFRHX (500). FFRHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.35 vs. RFRCX (4.68). FFRHX return over 5 years is better than : 44.39 vs. RFRCX (34.39).
| FFRHX | RFRCX | FFRHX / RFRCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 1.76 | 41% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 1.78 | 41% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.937 | -0.563 | 167% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 5000 | 10% |
| Net Assets | 16B | 728M | 2,198% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 8.13 | 6.99 | 116% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.35 | 4.68 | 114% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.77 | 15.13 | 137% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.39 | 34.39 | 129% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.03 | 36.29 | 152% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...