Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFRHX vs RFRCX
FFRHX vs RFRCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFRHX vs. RFRCX commentary
Sep 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFRHX is a Buy and RFRCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFRHX has more cash in the bank: 15.2B vs. RFRCX (747M). FFRHX pays higher dividends than RFRCX: FFRHX (7.67) vs RFRCX (6.31). FFRHX was incepted earlier than RFRCX: FFRHX (23 years) vs RFRCX (20 years). RFRCX (1.78) is less costly to investors than FFRHX (0.73). RFRCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 80.00 vs. FFRHX (41.00). FFRHX has a lower initial minimum investment than RFRCX: FFRHX (0) vs RFRCX (2000). RFRCX IRA initial investment is lower compared to FFRHX: RFRCX (5000) vs FFRHX (500). FFRHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.01 vs. RFRCX (6.64). FFRHX return over 5 years is better than : 37.95 vs. RFRCX (27.39).
| FFRHX | RFRCX | FFRHX / RFRCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 1.76 | 41% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 1.78 | 41% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.516 | 3.898 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 5000 | 10% |
| Net Assets | 15.2B | 747M | 2,035% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.67 | 6.31 | 122% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.01 | 6.64 | 106% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.14 | 24.16 | 116% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.95 | 27.39 | 139% |
| Returns for 10 years | 63.65 | 44.15 | 144% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers