Ad is loading...
FFRHX vs RFRFX
FFRHX vs RFRFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFRHX vs. RFRFX commentary
Apr 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFRHX is a Buy and RFRFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFRHX has more cash in the bank: 16B vs. RFRFX (727M). FFRHX (8.13) and RFRFX (8.03) have matching dividends . FFRHX was incepted earlier than RFRFX: FFRHX (23 years) vs RFRFX (17 years). RFRFX (0.76) and FFRHX (0.73) have similar cost to investors . RFRFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 80.00 vs. FFRHX (41.00). FFRHX (0) and RFRFX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RFRFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.81 vs. FFRHX (5.47). FFRHX return over 5 years is better than : 44.55 vs. RFRFX (41.68).
| FFRHX | RFRFX | FFRHX / RFRFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 0.73 | 100% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 0.76 | 96% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.828 | -0.238 | 348% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 16B | 727M | 2,201% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 8.13 | 8.03 | 101% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.47 | 5.81 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.03 | 18.94 | 111% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.55 | 41.68 | 107% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.04 | 51.29 | 107% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers