Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFRHX vs RFRFX
FFRHX vs RFRFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFRHX vs. RFRFX commentary
Aug 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFRHX is a Buy and RFRFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFRHX has more cash in the bank: 15.2B vs. RFRFX (748M). FFRHX (7.78) and RFRFX (7.43) have matching dividends . FFRHX was incepted earlier than RFRFX: FFRHX (23 years) vs RFRFX (17 years). RFRFX (0.76) and FFRHX (0.73) have similar cost to investors . RFRFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 80.00 vs. FFRHX (41.00). FFRHX (0) and RFRFX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RFRFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.83 vs. FFRHX (6.89). FFRHX return over 5 years is better than : 38.72 vs. RFRFX (35.34).
| FFRHX | RFRFX | FFRHX / RFRFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 0.73 | 100% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 0.76 | 96% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.770 | 3.922 | 71% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 15.2B | 748M | 2,032% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.78 | 7.43 | 105% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.89 | 7.83 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.83 | 26.50 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.72 | 35.34 | 110% |
| Returns for 10 years | 63.34 | 59.38 | 107% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement