Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFRHX vs RPIFX
FFRHX vs RPIFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFRHX vs. RPIFX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFRHX is a Buy and RPIFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFRHX has more cash in the bank: 14.8B vs. RPIFX (4.74B). FFRHX (7.97) and RPIFX (7.83) have matching dividends . FFRHX was incepted earlier than RPIFX: FFRHX (23 years) vs RPIFX (17 years). FFRHX (0.73) is less costly to investors than RPIFX (0.57). RPIFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 78.50 vs. FFRHX (41.00). FFRHX has a lower initial minimum investment than RPIFX: FFRHX (0) vs RPIFX (1000000). RPIFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.46 vs. FFRHX (6.37). FFRHX (39.30) and RPIFX (38.16) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FFRHX | RPIFX | FFRHX / RPIFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 0.57 | 128% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 0.57 | 128% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.414 | 2.316 | 61% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 14.8B | 4.74B | 312% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.97 | 7.83 | 102% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.37 | 7.46 | 85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.85 | 27.53 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.30 | 38.16 | 103% |
| Returns for 10 years | 58.37 | 61.40 | 95% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers