Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFRHX vs RPIFX
FFRHX vs RPIFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFRHX vs. RPIFX commentary
Jun 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFRHX is a Buy and RPIFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFRHX has more cash in the bank: 14.8B vs. RPIFX (4.8B). FFRHX (7.97) and RPIFX (7.83) have matching dividends . FFRHX was incepted earlier than RPIFX: FFRHX (23 years) vs RPIFX (17 years). FFRHX (0.73) is less costly to investors than RPIFX (0.57). RPIFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 78.50 vs. FFRHX (41.00). FFRHX has a lower initial minimum investment than RPIFX: FFRHX (0) vs RPIFX (1000000). RPIFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.03 vs. FFRHX (7.07). FFRHX (41.03) and RPIFX (39.94) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FFRHX | RPIFX | FFRHX / RPIFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 0.57 | 128% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 0.57 | 128% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.636 | 2.533 | 65% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 14.8B | 4.8B | 309% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.97 | 7.83 | 102% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.07 | 8.03 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.37 | 31.01 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.03 | 39.94 | 103% |
| Returns for 10 years | 59.22 | 61.81 | 96% |