Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFRIX vs PRFRX
FFRIX vs PRFRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFRIX vs. PRFRX commentary
Aug 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFRIX is a Hold and PRFRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFRIX has more cash in the bank: 15.2B vs. PRFRX (4.33B). FFRIX (7.74) and PRFRX (7.39) have matching dividends . FFRIX was incepted earlier than PRFRX: FFRIX (25 years) vs PRFRX (14 years). FFRIX (0.77) and PRFRX (0.76) have similar cost to investors . PRFRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.90 vs. FFRIX (41.00). FFRIX has a lower initial minimum investment than PRFRX: FFRIX (0) vs PRFRX (2500). PRFRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.34 vs. FFRIX (6.84). FFRIX (38.46) and PRFRX (36.63) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FFRIX | PRFRX | FFRIX / PRFRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.76 | 101% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.76 | 101% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.743 | 3.635 | 75% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 15.2B | 4.33B | 351% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.74 | 7.39 | 105% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.84 | 7.34 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.57 | 27.58 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.46 | 36.63 | 105% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.60 | 59.74 | 105% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers