Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFRIX vs RFRFX
FFRIX vs RFRFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFRIX vs. RFRFX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFRIX is a Hold and RFRFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFRIX has more cash in the bank: 15.2B vs. RFRFX (747M). FFRIX (7.64) and RFRFX (7.34) have matching dividends . FFRIX was incepted earlier than RFRFX: FFRIX (25 years) vs RFRFX (17 years). FFRIX (0.77) and RFRFX (0.76) have similar cost to investors . RFRFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 80.00 vs. FFRIX (41.00). FFRIX (0) and RFRFX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RFRFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.75 vs. FFRIX (6.97). FFRIX return over 5 years is better than : 37.69 vs. RFRFX (34.26).
| FFRIX | RFRFX | FFRIX / RFRFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.73 | 105% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.76 | 101% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.486 | 4.626 | 75% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 15.2B | 747M | 2,035% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.64 | 7.34 | 104% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.97 | 7.75 | 90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.02 | 28.10 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.69 | 34.26 | 110% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.90 | 60.06 | 105% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers