Ad is loading...
FFRIX vs RFRFX
FFRIX vs RFRFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFRIX vs. RFRFX commentary
Apr 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFRIX is a Hold and RFRFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFRIX has more cash in the bank: 16B vs. RFRFX (728M). FFRIX (8.09) and RFRFX (8.03) have matching dividends . FFRIX was incepted earlier than RFRFX: FFRIX (25 years) vs RFRFX (17 years). FFRIX (0.77) and RFRFX (0.76) have similar cost to investors . RFRFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 80.00 vs. FFRIX (41.00). FFRIX (0) and RFRFX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RFRFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.78 vs. FFRIX (5.43). FFRIX return over 5 years is better than : 44.29 vs. RFRFX (41.63).
| FFRIX | RFRFX | FFRIX / RFRFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.73 | 105% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.76 | 101% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.841 | -0.268 | 313% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 16B | 728M | 2,198% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 8.09 | 8.03 | 101% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.43 | 5.78 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.91 | 18.91 | 111% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.29 | 41.63 | 106% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.33 | 51.24 | 106% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...