Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFRIX vs RFRFX
FFRIX vs RFRFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFRIX vs. RFRFX commentary
May 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFRIX is a Hold and RFRFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFRIX has more cash in the bank: 14.4B vs. RFRFX (744M). FFRIX (8.08) and RFRFX (7.94) have matching dividends . FFRIX was incepted earlier than RFRFX: FFRIX (25 years) vs RFRFX (17 years). FFRIX (0.77) and RFRFX (0.76) have similar cost to investors . RFRFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 80.00 vs. FFRIX (41.00). FFRIX (0) and RFRFX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RFRFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.72 vs. FFRIX (6.03). FFRIX (42.69) and RFRFX (40.72) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FFRIX | RFRFX | FFRIX / RFRFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.73 | 105% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.76 | 101% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.532 | 1.420 | 37% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 14.4B | 744M | 1,935% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 8.08 | 7.94 | 102% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.03 | 6.72 | 90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.71 | 25.52 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.69 | 40.72 | 105% |
| Returns for 10 years | 56.16 | 53.62 | 105% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers