Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFRTX vs NFRFX
FFRTX vs NFRFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFRTX vs. NFRFX commentary
Aug 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFRTX is a Buy and NFRFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFRTX has more cash in the bank: 15.2B vs. NFRFX (1.6B). NFRFX pays higher dividends than FFRTX: NFRFX (8.14) vs FFRTX (7.49). FFRTX was incepted earlier than NFRFX: FFRTX (25 years) vs NFRFX (11 years). FFRTX (1.02) is less costly to investors than NFRFX (0.67). FFRTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. NFRFX (24.00). FFRTX has a lower initial minimum investment than NFRFX: FFRTX (0) vs NFRFX (1000000). NFRFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.53 vs. FFRTX (6.57). NFRFX return over 5 years is better than : 42.04 vs. FFRTX (37.01).
| FFRTX | NFRFX | FFRTX / NFRFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.67 | 152% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.67 | 152% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.482 | 3.502 | 71% |
| Front Load | 3% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 15.2B | 1.6B | 951% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.49 | 8.14 | 92% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.57 | 7.53 | 87% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.76 | 27.65 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.01 | 42.04 | 88% |
| Returns for 10 years | 58.52 | 64.03 | 91% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement