Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFSM vs SCHM
FFSM vs SCHM Comparison
Open Charts FFSM vs SCHM
Fidelity Fundamental Small-Mid Cap ETF
Price$29.19
Change+$0.11 (+0.38%)
Volume$2.15K
Net Assets779.43M
Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF™
Price$28.76
Change+$0.03 (+0.10%)
Volume$12.86K
Net Assets11.64B
FFSM vs SCHM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFSM vs. SCHM commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFSM is a Hold and SCHM is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCHM has more net assets: 11.6B vs. FFSM (779M). FFSM has a higher annual dividend yield than SCHM: FFSM (8.719) vs SCHM (4.798). FFSM was incepted earlier than SCHM: FFSM (5 years) vs SCHM (15 years). SCHM (0.04) has a lower expense ratio than FFSM (0.43). FFSM has a higher turnover SCHM (13.00) vs SCHM (13.00).
| FFSM | SCHM | FFSM / SCHM | |
| Gain YTD | 8.719 | 4.798 | 182% |
| Net Assets | 779M | 11.6B | 7% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.43 | 0.04 | 1,075% |
| Turnover | 66.00 | 13.00 | 508% |
| Yield | 0.65 | 1.43 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 15 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FFSM | SCHM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 79% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 82% | 8 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | N/A |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
FFSM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFSM has been closely correlated with SF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FFSM jumps, then SF could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FFSM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FFSM | 100% | +0.24% | ||
| SF - FFSM | 85% Closely correlated | +0.46% | ||
| BDC - FFSM | 85% Closely correlated | -0.73% | ||
| LAZ - FFSM | 84% Closely correlated | -2.16% | ||
| WTFC - FFSM | 82% Closely correlated | +1.43% | ||
| VNT - FFSM | 81% Closely correlated | -0.09% | ||
More | ||||
SCHM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHM has been loosely correlated with STLD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SCHM jumps, then STLD could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHM | 100% | +0.24% | ||
| STLD - SCHM | 55% Loosely correlated | -0.30% | ||
| PTC - SCHM | 54% Loosely correlated | -0.65% | ||
| DKNG - SCHM | 52% Loosely correlated | +1.91% | ||
| NTAP - SCHM | 42% Loosely correlated | -0.37% | ||
| WDC - SCHM | 41% Loosely correlated | -5.90% | ||
More | ||||