Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFSM vs VO
FFSM vs VO Comparison
Open Charts FFSM vs VO
Fidelity Fundamental Small-Mid Cap ETF
Price$26.38
Change-$0.09 (-0.34%)
Volume$55.09K
Net Assets671.96M
Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF
Price$272.13
Change+$0.57 (+0.21%)
Volume$600.21K
Net Assets185.28B
FFSM vs VO Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFSM vs. VO commentary
Jun 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFSM is a Hold and VO is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VO has more net assets: 185B vs. FFSM (672M). VO has a higher annual dividend yield than FFSM: VO (3.094) vs FFSM (-1.687). FFSM was incepted earlier than VO: FFSM (4 years) vs VO (21 years). VO (0.04) has a lower expense ratio than FFSM (0.43). FFSM has a higher turnover VO (16.00) vs VO (16.00).
| FFSM | VO | FFSM / VO | |
| Gain YTD | -1.687 | 3.094 | -55% |
| Net Assets | 672M | 185B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.43 | 0.04 | 1,075% |
| Turnover | 38.00 | 16.00 | 238% |
| Yield | 0.69 | 1.53 | 45% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 21 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FFSM | VO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 82% | 17 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 81% | 15 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 75% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FFSM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFSM has been closely correlated with SF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FFSM jumps, then SF could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FFSM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FFSM | 100% | +0.27% | ||
| SF - FFSM | 83% Closely correlated | +1.30% | ||
| BDC - FFSM | 81% Closely correlated | +0.56% | ||
| GTES - FFSM | 81% Closely correlated | +1.06% | ||
| EWBC - FFSM | 81% Closely correlated | +2.13% | ||
| LAZ - FFSM | 80% Closely correlated | +1.40% | ||
More | ||||