Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFTYX vs RGACX
FFTYX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts FFTYX vs RGACX
AB Sustainable US Thematic Advisor
Price$4.09
Change+$0.05 (+1.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets15.29M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$83.77
Change+$1.67 (+2.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets324.87B
FFTYX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFTYX vs. RGACX commentary
Nov 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFTYX is a Hold and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 325B vs. FFTYX (15.3M). FFTYX pays higher dividends than RGACX: FFTYX (1.04) vs RGACX (0.07). FFTYX was incepted earlier than RGACX: FFTYX (8 years) vs RGACX (24 years). RGACX (0.94) and FFTYX (0.92) have similar cost to investors . FFTYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). FFTYX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: FFTYX (0) vs RGACX (250). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.21 vs. FFTYX (-79.98). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 29.81 vs. FFTYX (-77.15).
| FFTYX | RGACX | FFTYX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.94 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 0.94 | 98% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -74.274 | 16.363 | -454% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 15.3M | 325B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.04 | 0.07 | 1,536% |
| Returns for 1 year | -79.98 | 6.21 | -1,287% |
| Returns for 3 years | -75.96 | 60.61 | -125% |
| Returns for 5 years | -77.15 | 29.81 | -259% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 86.59 | - |