Ad is loading...
FFTYX vs RGAGX
FFTYX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts FFTYX vs RGAGX
AB Sustainable US Thematic Advisor
Price$13.56
Change-$0.06 (-0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets51.4M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R6
Price$66.35
Change+$0.04 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets261.04B
FFTYX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFTYX vs. RGAGX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFTYX is a Buy and RGAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 261B vs. FFTYX (51.4M). FFTYX pays higher dividends than RGAGX: FFTYX (1.20) vs RGAGX (0.71). FFTYX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: FFTYX (8 years) vs RGAGX (16 years). FFTYX (0.92) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.30). FFTYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.00 vs. RGAGX (25.00). FFTYX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAGX: FFTYX (0) vs RGAGX (250). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.51 vs. FFTYX (-23.41). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 38.90 vs. FFTYX (5.89).
| FFTYX | RGAGX | FFTYX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.30 | 220% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.92 | 0.30 | 307% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -13.959 | -10.999 | 127% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 51.4M | 261B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.20 | 0.71 | 168% |
| Returns for 1 year | -23.41 | -2.51 | 931% |
| Returns for 3 years | -24.85 | 6.04 | -411% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.89 | 38.90 | 15% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 49.89 | - |