Ad is loading...
FFVCX vs FSNLX
FFVCX vs FSNLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFVCX vs. FSNLX commentary
Apr 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFVCX is a Hold and FSNLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSNLX has more cash in the bank: 4.32B vs. FFVCX (431M). FSNLX pays higher dividends than FFVCX: FSNLX (2.84) vs FFVCX (1.71). FFVCX was incepted earlier than FSNLX: FFVCX (21 years) vs FSNLX (8 years). FFVCX (1.52) is less costly to investors than FSNLX (0.46). FFVCX (13.00) and FSNLX (13.00) have comparable annual turnover. FFVCX (0) and FSNLX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSNLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.38 vs. FFVCX (5.04). FSNLX return over 5 years is better than : 7.94 vs. FFVCX (1.24).
| FFVCX | FSNLX | FFVCX / FSNLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 0.46 | 330% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 0.46 | 330% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.130 | 2.193 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 431M | 4.32B | 10% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.71 | 2.84 | 60% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.04 | 6.38 | 79% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.25 | 8.15 | 52% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.24 | 7.94 | 16% |
| Returns for 10 years | -11.00 | N/A | - |