Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFVCX vs FSNLX
FFVCX vs FSNLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFVCX vs. FSNLX commentary
Jun 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFVCX is a Hold and FSNLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSNLX has more cash in the bank: 4.32B vs. FFVCX (430M). FSNLX pays higher dividends than FFVCX: FSNLX (2.81) vs FFVCX (1.70). FFVCX was incepted earlier than FSNLX: FFVCX (22 years) vs FSNLX (8 years). FFVCX (1.50) is less costly to investors than FSNLX (0.45). FFVCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 17.00 vs. FSNLX (14.00). FFVCX (0) and FSNLX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSNLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.25 vs. FFVCX (3.03). FSNLX return over 5 years is better than : 7.13 vs. FFVCX (1.15).
| FFVCX | FSNLX | FFVCX / FSNLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.50 | 0.45 | 333% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.50 | 0.45 | 333% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.226 | 3.450 | 65% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 430M | 4.32B | 10% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.70 | 2.81 | 60% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.03 | 5.25 | 58% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.82 | 21.00 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.15 | 7.13 | 16% |
| Returns for 10 years | -8.70 | N/A | - |