FFWC
Price
$41.30
Change
+$0.30 (+0.73%)
Updated
Aug 27 closing price
Capitalization
45.35M
FGFH
Price
$32.00
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 27 closing price
Capitalization
115.39M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FFWC vs FGFH

Header iconFFWC vs FGFH Comparison
Open Charts FFWC vs FGFHBanner chart's image
FFW
Price$41.30
Change+$0.30 (+0.73%)
Volume$500
Capitalization45.35M
Foresight Financial Group
Price$32.00
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$2.9K
Capitalization115.39M
FFWC vs FGFH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FFWC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FGFH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FFWC vs. FGFH commentary
Aug 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFWC is a Buy and FGFH is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 29, 2025
Stock price -- (FFWC: $41.30 vs. FGFH: $32.00)
Brand notoriety: FFWC and FGFH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FFWC: 51% vs. FGFH: 103%
Market capitalization -- FFWC: $45.35M vs. FGFH: $115.39M
FFWC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $45.35M. FGFH’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $115.39M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $167.72B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.87B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FFWC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFGFH’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FFWC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FGFH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FFWC is a better buy in the long-term than FGFH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FFWC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FGFH’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FFWC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • FGFH’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FFWC is a better buy in the short-term than FGFH.

Price Growth

FFWC (@Regional Banks) experienced а +3.25% price change this week, while FGFH (@Regional Banks) price change was +1.27% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.64%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.11% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FGFH($115M) has a higher market cap than FFWC($45.4M). FFWC has higher P/E ratio than FGFH: FFWC (11.50) vs FGFH (6.65). FFWC YTD gains are higher at: 4.822 vs. FGFH (-1.175). FGFH has less debt than FFWC: FGFH (39.9M) vs FFWC (58.7M). FGFH has higher revenues than FFWC: FGFH (57M) vs FFWC (18.6M).
FFWCFGFHFFWC / FGFH
Capitalization45.4M115M39%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD4.822-1.175-410%
P/E Ratio11.506.65173%
Revenue18.6M57M33%
Total CashN/A28M-
Total Debt58.7M39.9M147%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FFWC vs FGFH: Fundamental Ratings
FFWC
FGFH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4032
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
39
Fair valued
25
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5252
SMR RATING
1..100
6953
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5155
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1256
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FGFH's Valuation (25) in the null industry is in the same range as FFWC (39). This means that FGFH’s stock grew similarly to FFWC’s over the last 12 months.

FGFH's Profit vs Risk Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as FFWC (52). This means that FGFH’s stock grew similarly to FFWC’s over the last 12 months.

FGFH's SMR Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as FFWC (69). This means that FGFH’s stock grew similarly to FFWC’s over the last 12 months.

FFWC's Price Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as FGFH (55). This means that FFWC’s stock grew similarly to FGFH’s over the last 12 months.

FFWC's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FGFH (56). This means that FFWC’s stock grew somewhat faster than FGFH’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FFWCFGFH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
19%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
22%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
31%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
18%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
30%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
27%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
18%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
19%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
33%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
20%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
27%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
26%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
27%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
27%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
31%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FFWC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FGFH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ASMVF7.44N/A
N/A
ASMPT LTD.
CYYHF0.27N/A
N/A
China Yongda Automobile Svcs Hldgs Ltd.
AWLIF0.19N/A
-0.11%
Ameriwest Critical Metals Inc
PSRHF0.33-0.01
-2.74%
PULSAR HELIUM INC.
BNDSY7.55-0.51
-6.37%
Banco De Sabadell SA

FFWC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FFWC and KPCUF have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FFWC and KPCUF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FFWC
1D Price
Change %
FFWC100%
+0.73%
KPCUF - FFWC
33%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FFDF - FFWC
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FIBH - FFWC
6%
Poorly correlated
+7.10%
FGFH - FFWC
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FIEB - FFWC
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

FGFH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FGFH and MVLY have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FGFH and MVLY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FGFH
1D Price
Change %
FGFH100%
N/A
MVLY - FGFH
33%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BNMDF - FGFH
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VWFB - FGFH
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.45%
INFT - FGFH
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
INBK - FGFH
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.44%
More