FFWC
Price
$43.60
Change
-$0.41 (-0.93%)
Updated
Oct 7 closing price
Capitalization
47.36M
FIEB
Price
$21.65
Change
-$0.15 (-0.69%)
Updated
Oct 7 closing price
Capitalization
196.25M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FFWC vs FIEB

Header iconFFWC vs FIEB Comparison
Open Charts FFWC vs FIEBBanner chart's image
FFW
Price$43.60
Change-$0.41 (-0.93%)
Volume$203
Capitalization47.36M
First IC
Price$21.65
Change-$0.15 (-0.69%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization196.25M
FFWC vs FIEB Comparison Chart in %
FFWC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FIEB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FFWC vs. FIEB commentary
Oct 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFWC is a Hold and FIEB is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 08, 2025
Stock price -- (FFWC: $43.60 vs. FIEB: $21.65)
Brand notoriety: FFWC and FIEB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FFWC: 15% vs. FIEB: 12%
Market capitalization -- FFWC: $47.36M vs. FIEB: $196.25M
FFWC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $47.36M. FIEB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $196.25M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $170.11B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.86B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FFWC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFIEB’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • FFWC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FIEB’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, FIEB is a better buy in the long-term than FFWC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FFWC’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FIEB’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FFWC’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • FIEB’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FFWC is a better buy in the short-term than FIEB.

Price Growth

FFWC (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.93% price change this week, while FIEB (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.69% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.53%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.06% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIEB($196M) has a higher market cap than FFWC($47.4M). FFWC has higher P/E ratio than FIEB: FFWC (12.01) vs FIEB (7.99). FIEB YTD gains are higher at: 157.827 vs. FFWC (11.465). FIEB has higher revenues than FFWC: FIEB (60.3M) vs FFWC (18.6M).
FFWCFIEBFFWC / FIEB
Capitalization47.4M196M24%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD11.465157.8277%
P/E Ratio12.017.99150%
Revenue18.6M60.3M31%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt58.7MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FFWC vs FIEB: Fundamental Ratings
FFWC
FIEB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9839
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
45
Fair valued
17
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
502
SMR RATING
1..100
6937
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4941
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
388
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
6550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FIEB's Valuation (17) in the null industry is in the same range as FFWC (45). This means that FIEB’s stock grew similarly to FFWC’s over the last 12 months.

FIEB's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FFWC (50). This means that FIEB’s stock grew somewhat faster than FFWC’s over the last 12 months.

FIEB's SMR Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as FFWC (69). This means that FIEB’s stock grew similarly to FFWC’s over the last 12 months.

FIEB's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as FFWC (49). This means that FIEB’s stock grew similarly to FFWC’s over the last 12 months.

FIEB's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the null industry is in the same range as FFWC (38). This means that FIEB’s stock grew similarly to FFWC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FFWCFIEB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
12%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
19%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
14%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
14%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
23%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
19%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
24%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
22%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
22%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
20%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
44%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
31%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
31%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FFWC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FIEB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
KAOCF45.91N/A
N/A
Kao Corp.
NPACY1.05N/A
N/A
Quadient SA
RTOXF4.80N/A
N/A
Rotork PLC
SNTL5.05-0.15
-2.88%
Sentinel Holdings Ltd.
WDGRF0.01-0.02
-70.29%
Wedgemount Resources Corp.

FFWC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FFWC and KPCUF have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FFWC and KPCUF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FFWC
1D Price
Change %
FFWC100%
-0.93%
KPCUF - FFWC
33%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FFDF - FFWC
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FIBH - FFWC
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FGFH - FFWC
6%
Poorly correlated
-0.44%
FIEB - FFWC
6%
Poorly correlated
-0.69%
More

FIEB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FIEB and INFT have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FIEB and INFT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FIEB
1D Price
Change %
FIEB100%
-0.69%
INFT - FIEB
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MTRBF - FIEB
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GVFF - FIEB
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CIZN - FIEB
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.75%
CBHC - FIEB
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More