FFWM
Price
$4.97
Change
-$0.14 (-2.74%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
407.13M
5 days until earnings call
MNSBP
Price
$24.78
Change
+$0.05 (+0.20%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Interact to see
Advertisement

FFWM vs MNSBP

Header iconFFWM vs MNSBP Comparison
Open Charts FFWM vs MNSBPBanner chart's image
First Foundation
Price$4.97
Change-$0.14 (-2.74%)
Volume$1.2M
Capitalization407.13M
MainStreet Bancshares
Price$24.78
Change+$0.05 (+0.20%)
Volume$3.3K
CapitalizationN/A
FFWM vs MNSBP Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FFWM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MNSBP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FFWM vs. MNSBP commentary
Jul 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFWM is a Hold and MNSBP is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 26, 2025
Stock price -- (FFWM: $4.97 vs. MNSBP: $24.78)
Brand notoriety: FFWM and MNSBP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FFWM: 173% vs. MNSBP: 87%
Market capitalization -- FFWM: $407.13M vs. MNSBP: $0
FFWM [@Regional Banks] is valued at $407.13M. MNSBP’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FFWM’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMNSBP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FFWM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MNSBP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FFWM is a better buy in the long-term than MNSBP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FFWM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MNSBP’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FFWM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MNSBP’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MNSBP is a better buy in the short-term than FFWM.

Price Growth

FFWM (@Regional Banks) experienced а -6.93% price change this week, while MNSBP (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.88% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.19%.

Reported Earning Dates

FFWM is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.50% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MNSBP YTD gains are higher at: 6.532 vs. FFWM (-19.968). MNSBP has less debt than FFWM: MNSBP (72.6M) vs FFWM (1.58B). FFWM has higher revenues than MNSBP: FFWM (175M) vs MNSBP (79.6M).
FFWMMNSBPFFWM / MNSBP
Capitalization407MN/A-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-19.9686.532-306%
P/E Ratio3.63N/A-
Revenue175M79.6M220%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt1.58B72.6M2,179%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FFWM: Fundamental Ratings
FFWM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
17
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
31
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
33
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
62
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
70
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FFWMMNSBP
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
21%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
36%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
28%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
32%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
31%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
31%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
30%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FFWM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MNSBP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IFRX0.900.05
+5.72%
InflaRx NV
AS37.660.84
+2.28%
Amer Sports
ZEUS33.270.49
+1.49%
Olympic Steel
NBTB41.38-0.17
-0.41%
NBT Bancorp
QVCGP5.57-0.17
-2.96%
QVC Group Inc.

FFWM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFWM has been closely correlated with SFBS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FFWM jumps, then SFBS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FFWM
1D Price
Change %
FFWM100%
-2.74%
SFBS - FFWM
71%
Closely correlated
-0.68%
HOPE - FFWM
71%
Closely correlated
N/A
CAC - FFWM
71%
Closely correlated
+0.12%
TCBK - FFWM
70%
Closely correlated
+1.92%
STEL - FFWM
69%
Closely correlated
-0.44%
More

MNSBP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MNSBP has been loosely correlated with FFWM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MNSBP jumps, then FFWM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MNSBP
1D Price
Change %
MNSBP100%
+0.20%
FFWM - MNSBP
40%
Loosely correlated
-2.74%
SBCF - MNSBP
38%
Loosely correlated
-0.17%
MCB - MNSBP
38%
Loosely correlated
-1.74%
ONBPO - MNSBP
37%
Loosely correlated
+0.29%
WAL - MNSBP
36%
Loosely correlated
-1.24%
More