FFWM
Price
$6.72
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 17 closing price
34 days until earnings call
SFNC
Price
$21.35
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 17 closing price
34 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FFWM vs SFNC

Header iconFFWM vs SFNC Comparison
Open Charts FFWM vs SFNCBanner chart's image
First Foundation
Price$6.72
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$287.21K
CapitalizationN/A
Simmons First National
Price$21.35
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$598.96K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
FFWM vs SFNC Comparison Chart
Loading...
FFWM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
SFNC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
FFWM vs. SFNC commentary
Sep 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFWM is a StrongBuy and SFNC is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 19, 2024
Stock price -- (FFWM: $6.72 vs. SFNC: $21.35)
Brand notoriety: FFWM and SFNC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FFWM: 44% vs. SFNC: 112%
Market capitalization -- FFWM: $407.13M vs. SFNC: $2.42B
FFWM [@Regional Banks] is valued at $407.13M. SFNC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $2.42B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.78B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FFWM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSFNC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FFWM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SFNC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SFNC is a better buy in the long-term than FFWM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FFWM’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SFNC’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FFWM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SFNC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FFWM is a better buy in the short-term than SFNC.

Price Growth

FFWM (@Regional Banks) experienced а +5.33% price change this week, while SFNC (@Regional Banks) price change was +5.33% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.23%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.86%.

Reported Earning Dates

FFWM is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2024.

SFNC is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.23% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SFNC($2.42B) has a higher market cap than FFWM($407M). SFNC has higher P/E ratio than FFWM: SFNC (13.98) vs FFWM (3.63). SFNC YTD gains are higher at: 11.352 vs. FFWM (-30.375). SFNC has less debt than FFWM: SFNC (1.34B) vs FFWM (1.58B). SFNC has higher revenues than FFWM: SFNC (782M) vs FFWM (175M).
FFWMSFNCFFWM / SFNC
Capitalization407M2.42B17%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-30.37511.352-268%
P/E Ratio3.6313.9826%
Revenue175M782M22%
Total CashN/A345M-
Total Debt1.58B1.34B118%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FFWM vs SFNC: Fundamental Ratings
FFWM
SFNC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1574
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
40
Fair valued
51
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10086
SMR RATING
1..100
2612
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5441
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7010
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FFWM's Valuation (40) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as SFNC (51) in the Major Banks industry. This means that FFWM’s stock grew similarly to SFNC’s over the last 12 months.

SFNC's Profit vs Risk Rating (86) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as FFWM (100) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that SFNC’s stock grew similarly to FFWM’s over the last 12 months.

SFNC's SMR Rating (12) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as FFWM (26) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that SFNC’s stock grew similarly to FFWM’s over the last 12 months.

SFNC's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as FFWM (54) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that SFNC’s stock grew similarly to FFWM’s over the last 12 months.

SFNC's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FFWM (70) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that SFNC’s stock grew somewhat faster than FFWM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FFWMSFNC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
71%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FFWM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
SFNC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JUSMX19.390.12
+0.62%
JPMorgan US Small Company R6
FMBRX17.350.04
+0.23%
Franklin Mutual Beacon R6
RLUEX9.860.01
+0.10%
Lazard US Equity Concentrated R6
RRBGX169.210.13
+0.08%
T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth R
GURPX34.92-0.23
-0.65%
Guggenheim Risk Managed Real Estt P

SFNC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SFNC has been closely correlated with PPBI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SFNC jumps, then PPBI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SFNC
1D Price
Change %
SFNC100%
+0.99%
PPBI - SFNC
88%
Closely correlated
+1.43%
WSBC - SFNC
87%
Closely correlated
+0.52%
FFBC - SFNC
87%
Closely correlated
+0.08%
ABCB - SFNC
87%
Closely correlated
+0.86%
SBCF - SFNC
87%
Closely correlated
+0.78%
More