FFWM
Price
$5.43
Change
-$0.21 (-3.72%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
447.36M
73 days until earnings call
STEL
Price
$29.34
Change
-$0.58 (-1.94%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
1.51B
69 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FFWM vs STEL

Header iconFFWM vs STEL Comparison
Open Charts FFWM vs STELBanner chart's image
First Foundation
Price$5.43
Change-$0.21 (-3.72%)
Volume$719.02K
Capitalization447.36M
Stellar Ban
Price$29.34
Change-$0.58 (-1.94%)
Volume$294.51K
Capitalization1.51B
FFWM vs STEL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FFWM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
STEL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FFWM vs. STEL commentary
Aug 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFWM is a Hold and STEL is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 16, 2025
Stock price -- (FFWM: $5.43 vs. STEL: $29.34)
Brand notoriety: FFWM and STEL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FFWM: 80% vs. STEL: 98%
Market capitalization -- FFWM: $447.36M vs. STEL: $1.51B
FFWM [@Regional Banks] is valued at $447.36M. STEL’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $1.51B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $174.7B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.97B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FFWM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSTEL’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FFWM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • STEL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, STEL is a better buy in the long-term than FFWM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FFWM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while STEL’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FFWM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • STEL’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, STEL is a better buy in the short-term than FFWM.

Price Growth

FFWM (@Regional Banks) experienced а +11.04% price change this week, while STEL (@Regional Banks) price change was +2.88% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.72%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.87%.

Reported Earning Dates

FFWM is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.

STEL is expected to report earnings on Oct 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.72% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
STEL($1.51B) has a higher market cap than FFWM($447M). FFWM has higher P/E ratio than STEL: FFWM (41.60) vs STEL (14.11). STEL YTD gains are higher at: 4.563 vs. FFWM (-12.560). STEL has less debt than FFWM: STEL (140M) vs FFWM (1.85B). STEL has higher revenues than FFWM: STEL (425M) vs FFWM (69.2M).
FFWMSTELFFWM / STEL
Capitalization447M1.51B30%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-12.5604.563-275%
P/E Ratio41.6014.11295%
Revenue69.2M425M16%
Total CashN/A131M-
Total Debt1.85B140M1,320%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FFWM vs STEL: Fundamental Ratings
FFWM
STEL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6165
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
90
Overvalued
52
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10047
SMR RATING
1..100
6019
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5051
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6828
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
25n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

STEL's Valuation (52) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FFWM (90) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that STEL’s stock grew somewhat faster than FFWM’s over the last 12 months.

STEL's Profit vs Risk Rating (47) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FFWM (100) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that STEL’s stock grew somewhat faster than FFWM’s over the last 12 months.

STEL's SMR Rating (19) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FFWM (60) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that STEL’s stock grew somewhat faster than FFWM’s over the last 12 months.

FFWM's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as STEL (51) in the null industry. This means that FFWM’s stock grew similarly to STEL’s over the last 12 months.

STEL's P/E Growth Rating (28) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FFWM (68) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that STEL’s stock grew somewhat faster than FFWM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FFWMSTEL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FFWM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
STEL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HQIAX21.54N/A
N/A
Hartford Equity Income A
GIRVX8.09N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Intl Eq Div & Prem Inv
PETGX14.53N/A
N/A
Gabelli Pet Parents'™ A
TEEFX84.21-0.18
-0.21%
T. Rowe Price Tax-Efficient Equity I
TVAFX78.40-0.51
-0.65%
Thornburg Small/Mid Cap Core A

FFWM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFWM has been closely correlated with HOPE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FFWM jumps, then HOPE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FFWM
1D Price
Change %
FFWM100%
-3.72%
HOPE - FFWM
71%
Closely correlated
-2.32%
TCBK - FFWM
71%
Closely correlated
-1.78%
SFBS - FFWM
71%
Closely correlated
-1.74%
UBSI - FFWM
71%
Closely correlated
-2.23%
STEL - FFWM
71%
Closely correlated
-1.94%
More

STEL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, STEL has been closely correlated with UBSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if STEL jumps, then UBSI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To STEL
1D Price
Change %
STEL100%
-1.94%
UBSI - STEL
90%
Closely correlated
-2.23%
FFBC - STEL
89%
Closely correlated
-1.08%
STBA - STEL
88%
Closely correlated
-2.29%
TCBK - STEL
88%
Closely correlated
-1.78%
TRMK - STEL
88%
Closely correlated
-1.15%
More