FFWM
Price
$5.34
Change
+$0.13 (+2.50%)
Updated
May 9 closing price
Capitalization
407.13M
80 days until earnings call
WBBW
Price
$34.00
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
May 7 closing price
Capitalization
48.8M
Ad is loading...

FFWM vs WBBW

Header iconFFWM vs WBBW Comparison
Open Charts FFWM vs WBBWBanner chart's image
First Foundation
Price$5.34
Change+$0.13 (+2.50%)
Volume$586.74K
Capitalization407.13M
Westbury Ban
Price$34.00
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$925
Capitalization48.8M
FFWM vs WBBW Comparison Chart
Loading...
FFWM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FFWM vs. WBBW commentary
May 10, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFWM is a StrongBuy and WBBW is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 10, 2025
Stock price -- (FFWM: $5.34 vs. WBBW: $34.00)
Brand notoriety: FFWM and WBBW are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FFWM: 67% vs. WBBW: 217%
Market capitalization -- FFWM: $407.13M vs. WBBW: $48.8M
FFWM [@Regional Banks] is valued at $407.13M. WBBW’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $48.8M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.97B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FFWM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWBBW’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FFWM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WBBW’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, WBBW is a better buy in the long-term than FFWM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FFWM’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • FFWM’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

FFWM (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.19% price change this week, while WBBW (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.22%.

Reported Earning Dates

FFWM is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2025.

WBBW is expected to report earnings on Jan 17, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.64% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFWM($407M) has a higher market cap than WBBW($48.8M). WBBW has higher P/E ratio than FFWM: WBBW (6.34) vs FFWM (3.63). WBBW YTD gains are higher at: 13.333 vs. FFWM (-14.010). WBBW has less debt than FFWM: WBBW (2.63M) vs FFWM (1.58B). FFWM has higher revenues than WBBW: FFWM (175M) vs WBBW (37.2M).
FFWMWBBWFFWM / WBBW
Capitalization407M48.8M834%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-14.01013.333-105%
P/E Ratio3.636.3457%
Revenue175M37.2M470%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt1.58B2.63M60,084%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FFWM vs WBBW: Fundamental Ratings
FFWM
WBBW
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7748
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
85
Overvalued
21
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10047
SMR RATING
1..100
1126
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5946
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6344
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WBBW's Valuation (21) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FFWM (85) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that WBBW’s stock grew somewhat faster than FFWM’s over the last 12 months.

WBBW's Profit vs Risk Rating (47) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FFWM (100) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that WBBW’s stock grew somewhat faster than FFWM’s over the last 12 months.

FFWM's SMR Rating (11) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as WBBW (26) in the null industry. This means that FFWM’s stock grew similarly to WBBW’s over the last 12 months.

WBBW's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as FFWM (59) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that WBBW’s stock grew similarly to FFWM’s over the last 12 months.

WBBW's P/E Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as FFWM (63) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that WBBW’s stock grew similarly to FFWM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FFWM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FFWM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AEYIX8.42N/A
N/A
American Century Equity Income C
WSMGX18.91N/A
N/A
Wilshire Small Company Growth Instl
JAAGX81.87N/A
N/A
Janus Henderson VIT Enterprise Instl
AWSIX16.01N/A
N/A
Invesco Global Core Equity R5
TRDIX7.89N/A
N/A
Transamerica Sustainable Equity Inc I2

FFWM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFWM has been closely correlated with TCBK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FFWM jumps, then TCBK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FFWM
1D Price
Change %
FFWM100%
+2.50%
TCBK - FFWM
68%
Closely correlated
-0.17%
SFBS - FFWM
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.17%
DCOM - FFWM
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.04%
UBSI - FFWM
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.92%
STEL - FFWM
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.60%
More

WBBW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WBBW and FFWM have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WBBW and FFWM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WBBW
1D Price
Change %
WBBW100%
N/A
FFWM - WBBW
24%
Poorly correlated
+2.50%
WBS - WBBW
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.70%
PCLB - WBBW
21%
Poorly correlated
-6.16%
VTYB - WBBW
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VABK - WBBW
4%
Poorly correlated
+0.22%
More