FFWM
Price
$6.29
Change
+$0.21 (+3.45%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
407.13M
11 days until earnings call
WBBW
Price
$31.00
Change
+$1.00 (+3.33%)
Updated
Jan 6 closing price
Capitalization
48.8M
Ad is loading...

FFWM vs WBBW

Header iconFFWM vs WBBW Comparison
Open Charts FFWM vs WBBWBanner chart's image
First Foundation
Price$6.29
Change+$0.21 (+3.45%)
Volume$357.3K
Capitalization407.13M
Westbury Ban
Price$31.00
Change+$1.00 (+3.33%)
Volume$1.36K
Capitalization48.8M
FFWM vs WBBW Comparison Chart
Loading...
FFWM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WBBW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FFWM vs. WBBW commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFWM is a Hold and WBBW is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (FFWM: $6.29 vs. WBBW: $31.00)
Brand notoriety: FFWM and WBBW are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FFWM: 81% vs. WBBW: 137%
Market capitalization -- FFWM: $407.13M vs. WBBW: $48.8M
FFWM [@Regional Banks] is valued at $407.13M. WBBW’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $48.8M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FFWM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileWBBW’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FFWM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • WBBW’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, WBBW is a better buy in the long-term than FFWM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FFWM’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WBBW’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FFWM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • WBBW’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WBBW is a better buy in the short-term than FFWM.

Price Growth

FFWM (@Regional Banks) experienced а +11.13% price change this week, while WBBW (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +3.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.25%.

Reported Earning Dates

FFWM is expected to report earnings on Apr 29, 2025.

WBBW is expected to report earnings on Jan 17, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+3.11% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFWM($407M) has a higher market cap than WBBW($48.8M). WBBW has higher P/E ratio than FFWM: WBBW (6.34) vs FFWM (3.63). WBBW YTD gains are higher at: 3.333 vs. FFWM (1.288). WBBW has less debt than FFWM: WBBW (2.63M) vs FFWM (1.58B). FFWM has higher revenues than WBBW: FFWM (175M) vs WBBW (37.2M).
FFWMWBBWFFWM / WBBW
Capitalization407M48.8M834%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD1.2883.33339%
P/E Ratio3.636.3457%
Revenue175M37.2M470%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt1.58B2.63M60,084%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FFWM vs WBBW: Fundamental Ratings
FFWM
WBBW
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1950
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
87
Overvalued
12
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10076
SMR RATING
1..100
3452
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7949
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7353
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WBBW's Valuation (12) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FFWM (87) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that WBBW’s stock grew significantly faster than FFWM’s over the last 12 months.

WBBW's Profit vs Risk Rating (76) in the null industry is in the same range as FFWM (100) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that WBBW’s stock grew similarly to FFWM’s over the last 12 months.

FFWM's SMR Rating (34) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as WBBW (52) in the null industry. This means that FFWM’s stock grew similarly to WBBW’s over the last 12 months.

WBBW's Price Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as FFWM (79) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that WBBW’s stock grew similarly to FFWM’s over the last 12 months.

WBBW's P/E Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as FFWM (73) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that WBBW’s stock grew similarly to FFWM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FFWMWBBW
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
46%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
36%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
36%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
37%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
36%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 25 days ago
65%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
75%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
76%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FFWM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WBBW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EKBCX14.270.17
+1.21%
Allspring Diversified Cap Bldr C
DGIFX25.510.20
+0.79%
Disciplined Growth Investors
VYSVX21.050.12
+0.57%
Vericimetry US Small Cap Value
MSRFX15.930.09
+0.57%
Morgan Stanley Inst Next Gen Em Mkts R6
VADAX73.570.36
+0.49%
Invesco Equally-Wtd S&P 500 A

FFWM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFWM has been closely correlated with SFNC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FFWM jumps, then SFNC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FFWM
1D Price
Change %
FFWM100%
+3.45%
SFNC - FFWM
68%
Closely correlated
+1.56%
VLY - FFWM
68%
Closely correlated
+1.91%
PPBI - FFWM
67%
Closely correlated
+1.70%
SFBS - FFWM
67%
Closely correlated
+2.08%
UBSI - FFWM
67%
Closely correlated
+1.13%
More

WBBW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WBBW has been loosely correlated with CBWBF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WBBW jumps, then CBWBF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WBBW
1D Price
Change %
WBBW100%
N/A
CBWBF - WBBW
33%
Loosely correlated
N/A
FFWM - WBBW
24%
Poorly correlated
+3.45%
WBS - WBBW
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.99%
PCLB - WBBW
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VTYB - WBBW
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More