Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFWTX vs REATX
FFWTX vs REATX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFWTX vs. REATX commentary
Jul 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFWTX is a Hold and REATX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
REATX has more cash in the bank: 3.9B vs. FFWTX (733M). FFWTX (3.07) and REATX (3.03) have matching dividends . FFWTX was incepted earlier than REATX: FFWTX (10 years) vs REATX (18 years). REATX (0.34) is less costly to investors than FFWTX (0.08). FFWTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 17.00 vs. REATX (8.00). REATX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFWTX: REATX (250) vs FFWTX (5000000). REATX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.17 vs. FFWTX (4.32). REATX return over 5 years is better than : 21.75 vs. FFWTX (10.76).
| FFWTX | REATX | FFWTX / REATX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.08 | 0.34 | 24% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.08 | 0.34 | 24% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.313 | 7.277 | 59% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 733M | 3.9B | 19% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.07 | 3.03 | 101% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.32 | 7.17 | 60% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.46 | 20.89 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.76 | 21.75 | 49% |
| Returns for 10 years | 17.57 | 37.68 | 47% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement