FFXDF
Price
$17.60
Change
-$0.15 (-0.85%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
2.38B
GSBD
Price
$11.44
Change
-$0.05 (-0.44%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
1.31B
60 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FFXDF vs GSBD

Header iconFFXDF vs GSBD Comparison
Open Charts FFXDF vs GSBDBanner chart's image
Fairfax India
Price$17.60
Change-$0.15 (-0.85%)
Volume$18.72K
Capitalization2.38B
Goldman Sachs BDC
Price$11.44
Change-$0.05 (-0.44%)
Volume$593.82K
Capitalization1.31B
FFXDF vs GSBD Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FFXDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GSBD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FFXDF vs. GSBD commentary
Sep 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFXDF is a Hold and GSBD is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 07, 2025
Stock price -- (FFXDF: $17.60 vs. GSBD: $11.44)
Brand notoriety: FFXDF and GSBD are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FFXDF: 92% vs. GSBD: 94%
Market capitalization -- FFXDF: $2.38B vs. GSBD: $1.31B
FFXDF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $2.38B. GSBD’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $1.31B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $170.21B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.49B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FFXDF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileGSBD’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FFXDF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • GSBD’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, GSBD is a better buy in the long-term than FFXDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FFXDF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GSBD’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FFXDF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • GSBD’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GSBD is a better buy in the short-term than FFXDF.

Price Growth

FFXDF (@Investment Managers) experienced а -3.24% price change this week, while GSBD (@Investment Managers) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.27%.

Reported Earning Dates

GSBD is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-0.32% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFXDF($2.38B) has a higher market cap than GSBD($1.31B). FFXDF has higher P/E ratio than GSBD: FFXDF (35.92) vs GSBD (9.15). FFXDF YTD gains are higher at: 9.976 vs. GSBD (3.411). FFXDF has less debt than GSBD: FFXDF (499M) vs GSBD (1.87B). GSBD has higher revenues than FFXDF: GSBD (161M) vs FFXDF (143M).
FFXDFGSBDFFXDF / GSBD
Capitalization2.38B1.31B182%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD9.9763.411292%
P/E Ratio35.929.15392%
Revenue143M161M89%
Total CashN/A82.8M-
Total Debt499M1.87B27%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FFXDF vs GSBD: Fundamental Ratings
FFXDF
GSBD
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5029
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
86
Overvalued
3
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2659
SMR RATING
1..100
9125
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6056
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
493
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5055

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GSBD's Valuation (3) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FFXDF (86). This means that GSBD’s stock grew significantly faster than FFXDF’s over the last 12 months.

FFXDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (26) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GSBD (59). This means that FFXDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GSBD’s over the last 12 months.

GSBD's SMR Rating (25) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FFXDF (91). This means that GSBD’s stock grew significantly faster than FFXDF’s over the last 12 months.

GSBD's Price Growth Rating (56) in the null industry is in the same range as FFXDF (60). This means that GSBD’s stock grew similarly to FFXDF’s over the last 12 months.

FFXDF's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GSBD (93). This means that FFXDF’s stock grew significantly faster than GSBD’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FFXDFGSBD
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
34%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
49%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
49%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
49%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 26 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
51%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
42%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FFXDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GSBD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DGBCX8.740.09
+1.04%
BNY Mellon Developed Markets RE Scs - C
BIRCX22.42N/A
N/A
BlackRock Sustainable Adg Lg Cp Cr C
CENTX14.02N/A
N/A
Centerstone Investors I
MQIFX15.93-0.02
-0.13%
Franklin Mutual Quest Z
JDVVX24.98-0.09
-0.36%
JHancock Disciplined Value R5

FFXDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FFXDF and WNDLF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FFXDF and WNDLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FFXDF
1D Price
Change %
FFXDF100%
-0.84%
WNDLF - FFXDF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HLNE - FFXDF
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.63%
GAIN - FFXDF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.50%
STT - FFXDF
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.97%
GSBD - FFXDF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.44%
More