FFXDF
Price
$14.73
Change
-$0.02 (-0.14%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
HLNE
Price
$181.03
Change
+$0.03 (+0.02%)
Updated
Oct 18, 11:28 AM (EDT)
11 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FFXDF vs HLNE

Header iconFFXDF vs HLNE Comparison
Open Charts FFXDF vs HLNEBanner chart's image
Fairfax India
Price$14.73
Change-$0.02 (-0.14%)
Volume$38.19K
CapitalizationN/A
Hamilton Lane
Price$181.03
Change+$0.03 (+0.02%)
Volume$300
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
FFXDF vs HLNE Comparison Chart
Loading...
FFXDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
HLNE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
FFXDF vs. HLNE commentary
Oct 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFXDF is a Sell and HLNE is a StrongSell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2024
Stock price -- (FFXDF: $14.73 vs. HLNE: $181.00)
Brand notoriety: FFXDF and HLNE are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FFXDF: 162% vs. HLNE: 65%
Market capitalization -- FFXDF: $1.96B vs. HLNE: $4.5B
FFXDF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $1.96B. HLNE’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $4.5B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.9B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FFXDF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHLNE’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FFXDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HLNE’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, HLNE is a better buy in the long-term than FFXDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FFXDF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HLNE’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FFXDF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • HLNE’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HLNE is a better buy in the short-term than FFXDF.

Price Growth

FFXDF (@Investment Managers) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while HLNE (@Investment Managers) price change was +4.88% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.44%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.48%.

Reported Earning Dates

HLNE is expected to report earnings on Feb 11, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-0.30% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HLNE($4.5B) has a higher market cap than FFXDF($1.96B). HLNE has higher P/E ratio than FFXDF: HLNE (34.22) vs FFXDF (25.45). HLNE YTD gains are higher at: 61.401 vs. FFXDF (-4.651). HLNE has less debt than FFXDF: HLNE (277M) vs FFXDF (497M). HLNE has higher revenues than FFXDF: HLNE (490M) vs FFXDF (112M).
FFXDFHLNEFFXDF / HLNE
Capitalization1.96B4.5B44%
EBITDAN/A271M-
Gain YTD-4.65161.401-8%
P/E Ratio25.4534.2274%
Revenue112M490M23%
Total CashN/A164M-
Total Debt497M277M179%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FFXDF vs HLNE: Fundamental Ratings
FFXDF
HLNE
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7530
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
70
Overvalued
69
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
669
SMR RATING
1..100
8029
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5537
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2140
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8585

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HLNE's Valuation (69) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as FFXDF (70) in the null industry. This means that HLNE’s stock grew similarly to FFXDF’s over the last 12 months.

HLNE's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FFXDF (66) in the null industry. This means that HLNE’s stock grew somewhat faster than FFXDF’s over the last 12 months.

HLNE's SMR Rating (29) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FFXDF (80) in the null industry. This means that HLNE’s stock grew somewhat faster than FFXDF’s over the last 12 months.

HLNE's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as FFXDF (55) in the null industry. This means that HLNE’s stock grew similarly to FFXDF’s over the last 12 months.

FFXDF's P/E Growth Rating (21) in the null industry is in the same range as HLNE (40) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that FFXDF’s stock grew similarly to HLNE’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FFXDFHLNE
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
65%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FFXDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
HLNE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL232.150.37
+0.16%
Apple
SPY582.350.05
+0.01%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
TSLA220.89-0.44
-0.20%
Tesla
BTC.X67399.836000-212.882810
-0.31%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
GME21.41-0.25
-1.15%
GameStop Corp

FFXDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FFXDF and WNDLF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FFXDF and WNDLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FFXDF
1D Price
Change %
FFXDF100%
+0.14%
WNDLF - FFXDF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HLNE - FFXDF
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.53%
STT - FFXDF
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.36%
NTRS - FFXDF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.39%
TPG - FFXDF
22%
Poorly correlated
+4.51%
More

HLNE and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HLNE has been loosely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HLNE jumps, then BN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HLNE
1D Price
Change %
HLNE100%
+1.53%
BN - HLNE
62%
Loosely correlated
+1.13%
BAM - HLNE
60%
Loosely correlated
+1.53%
APAM - HLNE
59%
Loosely correlated
+1.71%
TPG - HLNE
58%
Loosely correlated
+4.51%
AMG - HLNE
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.74%
More