FFXDF
Price
$18.66
Change
+$0.06 (+0.32%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
1.96B
HLNE
Price
$147.02
Change
+$1.87 (+1.29%)
Updated
Jul 3, 02:00 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
4.5B
33 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FFXDF vs HLNE

Header iconFFXDF vs HLNE Comparison
Open Charts FFXDF vs HLNEBanner chart's image
Fairfax India
Price$18.66
Change+$0.06 (+0.32%)
Volume$22.84K
Capitalization1.96B
Hamilton Lane
Price$147.02
Change+$1.87 (+1.29%)
Volume$22.66K
Capitalization4.5B
FFXDF vs HLNE Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FFXDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HLNE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FFXDF vs. HLNE commentary
Jul 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFXDF is a StrongBuy and HLNE is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 04, 2025
Stock price -- (FFXDF: $19.05 vs. HLNE: $147.02)
Brand notoriety: FFXDF and HLNE are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FFXDF: 38% vs. HLNE: 28%
Market capitalization -- FFXDF: $1.96B vs. HLNE: $4.5B
FFXDF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $1.96B. HLNE’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $4.5B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $6.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FFXDF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileHLNE’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FFXDF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • HLNE’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, HLNE is a better buy in the long-term than FFXDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FFXDF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HLNE’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FFXDF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • HLNE’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HLNE is a better buy in the short-term than FFXDF.

Price Growth

FFXDF (@Investment Managers) experienced а +4.10% price change this week, while HLNE (@Investment Managers) price change was +1.93% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +2.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.33%.

Reported Earning Dates

HLNE is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+2.17% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HLNE($4.5B) has a higher market cap than FFXDF($1.96B). HLNE has higher P/E ratio than FFXDF: HLNE (34.22) vs FFXDF (25.45). FFXDF YTD gains are higher at: 19.033 vs. HLNE (0.050). HLNE has less debt than FFXDF: HLNE (277M) vs FFXDF (497M). HLNE has higher revenues than FFXDF: HLNE (490M) vs FFXDF (112M).
FFXDFHLNEFFXDF / HLNE
Capitalization1.96B4.5B44%
EBITDAN/A271M-
Gain YTD19.0330.05038,082%
P/E Ratio25.4534.2274%
Revenue112M490M23%
Total CashN/A164M-
Total Debt497M277M179%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FFXDF vs HLNE: Fundamental Ratings
FFXDF
HLNE
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2353
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
83
Overvalued
43
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2136
SMR RATING
1..100
8928
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4558
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
379
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HLNE's Valuation (43) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FFXDF (83) in the null industry. This means that HLNE’s stock grew somewhat faster than FFXDF’s over the last 12 months.

FFXDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (21) in the null industry is in the same range as HLNE (36) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that FFXDF’s stock grew similarly to HLNE’s over the last 12 months.

HLNE's SMR Rating (28) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FFXDF (89) in the null industry. This means that HLNE’s stock grew somewhat faster than FFXDF’s over the last 12 months.

FFXDF's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as HLNE (58) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that FFXDF’s stock grew similarly to HLNE’s over the last 12 months.

FFXDF's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for HLNE (79) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that FFXDF’s stock grew significantly faster than HLNE’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FFXDFHLNE
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FFXDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HLNE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DNDGX20.43N/A
N/A
Dunham Small Cap Growth N
ACFLX10.71N/A
N/A
American Century Focused Lg Cap Val G
PMBMX43.20N/A
N/A
Principal MidCap R3
BSGLX37.21N/A
N/A
Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Gr I
GSBAX14.80N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Growth C

FFXDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FFXDF and WNDLF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FFXDF and WNDLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FFXDF
1D Price
Change %
FFXDF100%
+2.09%
WNDLF - FFXDF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HLNE - FFXDF
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.29%
GAIN - FFXDF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.56%
STT - FFXDF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.75%
GSBD - FFXDF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.35%
More

HLNE and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HLNE has been closely correlated with STEP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HLNE jumps, then STEP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HLNE
1D Price
Change %
HLNE100%
+1.29%
STEP - HLNE
79%
Closely correlated
+0.71%
JHG - HLNE
77%
Closely correlated
+0.47%
BX - HLNE
75%
Closely correlated
+1.02%
BN - HLNE
73%
Closely correlated
+2.67%
KKR - HLNE
73%
Closely correlated
+3.03%
More