FFXDF
Price
$19.05
Change
+$0.39 (+2.09%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
1.96B
STT
Price
$109.49
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
23.35B
11 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FFXDF vs STT

Header iconFFXDF vs STT Comparison
Open Charts FFXDF vs STTBanner chart's image
Fairfax India
Price$19.05
Change+$0.39 (+2.09%)
Volume$12.09K
Capitalization1.96B
State Street
Price$109.49
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$68.45K
Capitalization23.35B
FFXDF vs STT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FFXDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
STT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FFXDF vs. STT commentary
Jul 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFXDF is a StrongBuy and STT is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 04, 2025
Stock price -- (FFXDF: $19.05 vs. STT: $110.31)
Brand notoriety: FFXDF and STT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FFXDF: 38% vs. STT: 65%
Market capitalization -- FFXDF: $1.96B vs. STT: $23.35B
FFXDF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $1.96B. STT’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $23.35B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $6.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FFXDF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSTT’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • FFXDF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • STT’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, STT is a better buy in the long-term than FFXDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FFXDF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while STT’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FFXDF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • STT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, STT is a better buy in the short-term than FFXDF.

Price Growth

FFXDF (@Investment Managers) experienced а +4.10% price change this week, while STT (@Investment Managers) price change was +5.44% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +2.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.33%.

Reported Earning Dates

STT is expected to report earnings on Jul 15, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+2.17% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
STT($23.3B) has a higher market cap than FFXDF($1.96B). FFXDF has higher P/E ratio than STT: FFXDF (25.45) vs STT (13.84). FFXDF YTD gains are higher at: 19.033 vs. STT (15.058). FFXDF has less debt than STT: FFXDF (497M) vs STT (21.5B). STT has higher revenues than FFXDF: STT (11.9B) vs FFXDF (112M).
FFXDFSTTFFXDF / STT
Capitalization1.96B23.3B8%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD19.03315.058126%
P/E Ratio25.4513.84184%
Revenue112M11.9B1%
Total CashN/A4.05B-
Total Debt497M21.5B2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FFXDF vs STT: Fundamental Ratings
FFXDF
STT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2233
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
83
Overvalued
37
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2132
SMR RATING
1..100
898
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
467
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
367
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a33

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

STT's Valuation (37) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FFXDF (83) in the null industry. This means that STT’s stock grew somewhat faster than FFXDF’s over the last 12 months.

FFXDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (21) in the null industry is in the same range as STT (32) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that FFXDF’s stock grew similarly to STT’s over the last 12 months.

STT's SMR Rating (8) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for FFXDF (89) in the null industry. This means that STT’s stock grew significantly faster than FFXDF’s over the last 12 months.

STT's Price Growth Rating (7) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FFXDF (46) in the null industry. This means that STT’s stock grew somewhat faster than FFXDF’s over the last 12 months.

FFXDF's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for STT (67) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that FFXDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than STT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FFXDFSTT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
63%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FFXDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
STT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CWI32.820.09
+0.27%
SPDR® MSCI ACWI ex-US ETF
GHMS26.16N/A
-0.01%
Goose Hollow Multi-Strategy Income ETF
BRW8.12-0.01
-0.12%
Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund
YSEP24.36-0.03
-0.12%
FT Vest Intl Eq Mod Bfr ETF Sep
GSKH52.73-0.36
-0.67%
GSK PLC ADRHEDGED GSKH

FFXDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FFXDF and WNDLF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FFXDF and WNDLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FFXDF
1D Price
Change %
FFXDF100%
+2.09%
WNDLF - FFXDF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HLNE - FFXDF
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.29%
GAIN - FFXDF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.56%
STT - FFXDF
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.75%
GSBD - FFXDF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.35%
More

STT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, STT has been closely correlated with NTRS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if STT jumps, then NTRS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To STT
1D Price
Change %
STT100%
+0.75%
NTRS - STT
82%
Closely correlated
-0.27%
BN - STT
78%
Closely correlated
+2.67%
PFG - STT
77%
Closely correlated
+0.61%
BLK - STT
76%
Closely correlated
+1.08%
CRBG - STT
76%
Closely correlated
+1.22%
More