FGBI
Price
$10.33
Change
+$0.01 (+0.10%)
Updated
Jan 14, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
126.92M
69 days until earnings call
MBWM
Price
$43.38
Change
+$1.17 (+2.77%)
Updated
Jan 14, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
605.34M
7 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FGBI vs MBWM

Header iconFGBI vs MBWM Comparison
Open Charts FGBI vs MBWMBanner chart's image
First Guaranty Bancshares
Price$10.33
Change+$0.01 (+0.10%)
Volume$286
Capitalization126.92M
Mercantile Bank
Price$43.38
Change+$1.17 (+2.77%)
Volume$800
Capitalization605.34M
FGBI vs MBWM Comparison Chart
Loading...
FGBI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MBWM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FGBI vs. MBWM commentary
Jan 15, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGBI is a Buy and MBWM is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 15, 2025
Stock price -- (FGBI: $10.23 vs. MBWM: $43.46)
Brand notoriety: FGBI and MBWM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FGBI: 56% vs. MBWM: 74%
Market capitalization -- FGBI: $126.92M vs. MBWM: $605.34M
FGBI [@Regional Banks] is valued at $126.92M. MBWM’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $605.34M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FGBI’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMBWM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FGBI’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MBWM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MBWM is a better buy in the long-term than FGBI.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FGBI’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MBWM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FGBI’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MBWM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MBWM is a better buy in the short-term than FGBI.

Price Growth

FGBI (@Regional Banks) experienced а -4.30% price change this week, while MBWM (@Regional Banks) price change was +1.23% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.05%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.80%.

Reported Earning Dates

FGBI is expected to report earnings on Apr 24, 2025.

MBWM is expected to report earnings on Apr 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.11% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MBWM($605M) has a higher market cap than FGBI($127M). FGBI has higher P/E ratio than MBWM: FGBI (16.52) vs MBWM (7.32). MBWM YTD gains are higher at: -5.125 vs. FGBI (-9.155). MBWM has more cash in the bank: 64.6M vs. FGBI (59.6M). FGBI has less debt than MBWM: FGBI (269M) vs MBWM (607M). MBWM has higher revenues than FGBI: MBWM (226M) vs FGBI (93.5M).
FGBIMBWMFGBI / MBWM
Capitalization127M605M21%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-9.155-5.125179%
P/E Ratio16.527.32226%
Revenue93.5M226M41%
Total Cash59.6M64.6M92%
Total Debt269M607M44%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FGBI vs MBWM: Fundamental Ratings
FGBI
MBWM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5060
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
9
Undervalued
59
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10041
SMR RATING
1..100
4218
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5960
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8849
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FGBI's Valuation (9) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MBWM (59). This means that FGBI’s stock grew somewhat faster than MBWM’s over the last 12 months.

MBWM's Profit vs Risk Rating (41) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FGBI (100). This means that MBWM’s stock grew somewhat faster than FGBI’s over the last 12 months.

MBWM's SMR Rating (18) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FGBI (42). This means that MBWM’s stock grew similarly to FGBI’s over the last 12 months.

FGBI's Price Growth Rating (59) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MBWM (60). This means that FGBI’s stock grew similarly to MBWM’s over the last 12 months.

MBWM's P/E Growth Rating (49) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FGBI (88). This means that MBWM’s stock grew somewhat faster than FGBI’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FGBIMBWM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
76%
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
75%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
57%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FGBI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MBWM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MMNGF0.10N/A
+0.90%
Metallic Minerals Corp.
BVVBY60.82-0.20
-0.33%
Bureau Veritas SA
HESAF2428.64-15.91
-0.65%
Hermes International SA
JSGRY21.36-0.26
-1.20%
LIXIL Corp.
DTRUY19.26-0.37
-1.90%
DAIMLER TRUCK HLDG AG

FGBI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FGBI and CBFV have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FGBI and CBFV's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FGBI
1D Price
Change %
FGBI100%
-1.43%
CBFV - FGBI
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.45%
GABC - FGBI
28%
Poorly correlated
+2.11%
TBNK - FGBI
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.34%
SBNY - FGBI
28%
Poorly correlated
-2.44%
COLB - FGBI
28%
Poorly correlated
+1.56%
More

MBWM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MBWM has been closely correlated with FRME. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MBWM jumps, then FRME could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MBWM
1D Price
Change %
MBWM100%
+1.25%
FRME - MBWM
89%
Closely correlated
+1.58%
TCBK - MBWM
89%
Closely correlated
+1.25%
PEBO - MBWM
89%
Closely correlated
+0.66%
FMBH - MBWM
88%
Closely correlated
+1.19%
THFF - MBWM
88%
Closely correlated
+1.47%
More