Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGBWX vs TNBMX
FGBWX vs TNBMX Comparison
Open Charts FGBWX vs TNBMX
Fidelity Advisor Global Credit M
Price$8.25
Change-$0.01 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets54.08M
T. Rowe Price Intl Bd (USD Hdgd) I
Price$8.57
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.24B
FGBWX vs TNBMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGBWX vs. TNBMX commentary
Sep 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGBWX is a Hold and TNBMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TNBMX has more cash in the bank: 7.24B vs. FGBWX (54.1M). FGBWX pays higher dividends than TNBMX: FGBWX (3.78) vs TNBMX (3.44). FGBWX was incepted earlier than TNBMX: FGBWX (13 years) vs TNBMX (8 years). FGBWX (0.90) is less costly to investors than TNBMX (0.53). FGBWX (57.00) and TNBMX (54.50) have comparable annual turnover. FGBWX has a lower initial minimum investment than TNBMX: FGBWX (0) vs TNBMX (500000). FGBWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.57 vs. TNBMX (3.51). FGBWX return over 5 years is better than : -1.50 vs. TNBMX (-5.88).
| FGBWX | TNBMX | FGBWX / TNBMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.53 | 142% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.53 | 170% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.315 | 3.011 | 210% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 500000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 54.1M | 7.24B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.78 | 3.44 | 110% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.57 | 3.51 | 159% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.94 | 6.12 | 310% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.50 | -5.88 | 26% |
| Returns for 10 years | 18.42 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers