Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGBYX vs TNBMX
FGBYX vs TNBMX Comparison
Open Charts FGBYX vs TNBMX
Fidelity Advisor Global Credit C
Price$8.25
Change-$0.01 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets54.08M
T. Rowe Price Intl Bd (USD Hdgd) I
Price$8.57
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.24B
FGBYX vs TNBMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGBYX vs. TNBMX commentary
Sep 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGBYX is a Hold and TNBMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TNBMX has more cash in the bank: 7.24B vs. FGBYX (54.1M). TNBMX pays higher dividends than FGBYX: TNBMX (3.44) vs FGBYX (3.07). FGBYX was incepted earlier than TNBMX: FGBYX (13 years) vs TNBMX (8 years). FGBYX (1.65) is less costly to investors than TNBMX (0.53). FGBYX (57.00) and TNBMX (54.50) have comparable annual turnover. FGBYX has a lower initial minimum investment than TNBMX: FGBYX (0) vs TNBMX (500000). FGBYX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.94 vs. TNBMX (3.51). FGBYX return over 5 years is better than : -5.05 vs. TNBMX (-5.88).
| FGBYX | TNBMX | FGBYX / TNBMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.50 | 0.53 | 283% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.65 | 0.53 | 311% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.923 | 3.011 | 197% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 500000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 54.1M | 7.24B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.07 | 3.44 | 89% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.94 | 3.51 | 141% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.42 | 6.12 | 268% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.05 | -5.88 | 86% |
| Returns for 10 years | 11.19 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement