Ad is loading...
FGD vs FNDF
FGD vs FNDF Comparison
Open Charts FGD vs FNDF
First Trust Dow Jones Global Sel Div ETF
Price$23.32
Change+$0.49 (+2.15%)
Volume$3.96K
Net Assets562.56M
Schwab Fundamental International Eq ETF
Price$34.77
Change+$0.92 (+2.72%)
Volume$4.42K
Net Assets12.88B
FGD vs FNDF Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGD vs. FNDF commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGD is a Hold and FNDF is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNDF has more net assets: 12.9B vs. FGD (563M). FGD has a higher annual dividend yield than FNDF: FGD (3.145) vs FNDF (1.957). FGD was incepted earlier than FNDF: FGD (17 years) vs FNDF (12 years). FNDF (0.25) has a lower expense ratio than FGD (0.56). FGD has a higher turnover FNDF (11.00) vs FNDF (11.00).
| FGD | FNDF | FGD / FNDF | |
| Gain YTD | 3.145 | 1.957 | 161% |
| Net Assets | 563M | 12.9B | 4% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.25 | 224% |
| Turnover | 36.00 | 11.00 | 327% |
| Yield | 5.77 | 3.70 | 156% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 12 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FGD | FNDF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 65% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 63% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 75% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 83% | 10 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 78% | 4 days ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FGD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FGD has been loosely correlated with APAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FGD jumps, then APAM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
FNDF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNDF has been closely correlated with STM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FNDF jumps, then STM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FNDF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FNDF | 100% | -2.14% | ||
| STM - FNDF | 75% Closely correlated | -12.36% | ||
| BNT - FNDF | 74% Closely correlated | -6.90% | ||
| BN - FNDF | 72% Closely correlated | -6.98% | ||
| BAM - FNDF | 72% Closely correlated | -2.00% | ||
| BNS - FNDF | 68% Closely correlated | -2.17% | ||
More | ||||