Ad is loading...
FGDKX vs GFAFX
FGDKX vs GFAFX Comparison
Open Charts FGDKX vs GFAFX
Fidelity Growth Discovery K
Price$58.51
Change+$0.45 (+0.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.52B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$71.96
Change+$0.53 (+0.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets283.8B
FGDKX vs GFAFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGDKX vs. GFAFX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGDKX is a Buy and GFAFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 284B vs. FGDKX (5.52B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than FGDKX: GFAFX (0.35) vs FGDKX (0.00). FGDKX was incepted earlier than GFAFX: FGDKX (17 years) vs GFAFX (24 years). GFAFX (0.67) is less costly to investors than FGDKX (0.58). FGDKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). FGDKX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFAFX: FGDKX (0) vs GFAFX (250). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.57 vs. FGDKX (-6.45). GFAFX (44.32) and FGDKX (43.15) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FGDKX | GFAFX | FGDKX / GFAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 0.67 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 0.67 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.037 | -2.440 | 247% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.52B | 284B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.35 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.45 | 3.57 | -180% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.03 | 34.10 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.15 | 44.32 | 97% |
| Returns for 10 years | 135.96 | 61.32 | 222% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...