FGETF
Price
$8.10
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 18 closing price
Capitalization
1.76B
HSWLF
Price
$1.55
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 18 closing price
Capitalization
197.99M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FGETF vs HSWLF

Header iconFGETF vs HSWLF Comparison
Open Charts FGETF vs HSWLFBanner chart's image
FLIGHT CENTRE TRAVEL GROUP
Price$8.10
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$150
Capitalization1.76B
Hostelworld Group
Price$1.55
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization197.99M
FGETF vs HSWLF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
HSWLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FGETF vs. HSWLF commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGETF is a Hold and HSWLF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (FGETF: $8.10 vs. HSWLF: $1.55)
Brand notoriety: FGETF and HSWLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Consumer Sundries industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FGETF: 28% vs. HSWLF: 108%
Market capitalization -- FGETF: $1.76B vs. HSWLF: $197.99M
FGETF [@Consumer Sundries] is valued at $1.76B. HSWLF’s [@Consumer Sundries] market capitalization is $197.99M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Consumer Sundries] industry ranges from $178.44B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Consumer Sundries] industry is $18.27B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FGETF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHSWLF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FGETF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HSWLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, HSWLF is a better buy in the long-term than FGETF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HSWLF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • HSWLF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 2 bearish.

Price Growth

FGETF (@Consumer Sundries) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while HSWLF (@Consumer Sundries) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Consumer Sundries industry was +9.70%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +15.40%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.38%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Consumer Sundries (+9.70% weekly)

Consumer sundries companies make products that usually do not have another classification, such as lawn and garden products, pest-control products, pet food and pet products like leashes, collars, and harnesses. Central Garden & Pet Company and Dogness (International) Corporation are examples of companies operating in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FGETF($1.76B) has a higher market cap than HSWLF($198M). FGETF has higher P/E ratio than HSWLF: FGETF (25.26) vs HSWLF (22.53). HSWLF YTD gains are higher at: -6.061 vs. FGETF (-43.909). FGETF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 407M vs. HSWLF (18.5M). FGETF has more cash in the bank: 1.17B vs. HSWLF (11M). HSWLF has less debt than FGETF: HSWLF (100K) vs FGETF (988M). FGETF has higher revenues than HSWLF: FGETF (2.75B) vs HSWLF (92.3M).
FGETFHSWLFFGETF / HSWLF
Capitalization1.76B198M888%
EBITDA407M18.5M2,200%
Gain YTD-43.909-6.061725%
P/E Ratio25.2622.53112%
Revenue2.75B92.3M2,980%
Total Cash1.17B11M10,618%
Total Debt988M100K988,000%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FGETF vs HSWLF: Fundamental Ratings
FGETF
HSWLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
22
Undervalued
56
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8843
SMR RATING
1..100
8467
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7959
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9112
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5065

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FGETF's Valuation (22) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HSWLF (56). This means that FGETF’s stock grew somewhat faster than HSWLF’s over the last 12 months.

HSWLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (43) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FGETF (88). This means that HSWLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FGETF’s over the last 12 months.

HSWLF's SMR Rating (67) in the null industry is in the same range as FGETF (84). This means that HSWLF’s stock grew similarly to FGETF’s over the last 12 months.

HSWLF's Price Growth Rating (59) in the null industry is in the same range as FGETF (79). This means that HSWLF’s stock grew similarly to FGETF’s over the last 12 months.

HSWLF's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FGETF (91). This means that HSWLF’s stock grew significantly faster than FGETF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FGETFHSWLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
33%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
26%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
30%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
11%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
28%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
12%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
27%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HSWLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LZESX12.470.12
+0.97%
Lazard International Equity Select Open
ERSMX31.970.08
+0.25%
Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap R
LGCVX19.680.04
+0.20%
Lord Abbett Global Equity R5
DDICX15.90-0.01
-0.06%
Macquarie Wealth Builder C
ACAAX41.07-0.10
-0.24%
Alger Capital Appreciation A

FGETF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FGETF and HWGG have been poorly correlated (+5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FGETF and HWGG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FGETF
1D Price
Change %
FGETF100%
N/A
HWGG - FGETF
5%
Poorly correlated
+29.68%
WW - FGETF
2%
Poorly correlated
-5.13%
TCOM - FGETF
2%
Poorly correlated
-0.27%
CTMLF - FGETF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GDDFF - FGETF
0%
Poorly correlated
+24.32%
More

HSWLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HSWLF and DRTGF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HSWLF and DRTGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HSWLF
1D Price
Change %
HSWLF100%
N/A
DRTGF - HSWLF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CTMLF - HSWLF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EDDRF - HSWLF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FGETF - HSWLF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HWGG - HSWLF
-0%
Poorly correlated
+29.68%
More