FGETF
Price
$8.10
Change
-$1.35 (-14.29%)
Updated
Apr 3 closing price
Capitalization
3.06B
HWGG
Price
$6.49
Change
+$1.89 (+41.09%)
Updated
May 1 closing price
Capitalization
5B
Ad is loading...

FGETF vs HWGG

Header iconFGETF vs HWGG Comparison
Open Charts FGETF vs HWGGBanner chart's image
FLIGHT CENTRE TRAVEL GROUP
Price$8.10
Change-$1.35 (-14.29%)
Volume$715
Capitalization3.06B
HWGG Entertainment
Price$6.49
Change+$1.89 (+41.09%)
Volume$24.15K
Capitalization5B
FGETF vs HWGG Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FGETF vs. HWGG commentary
May 02, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGETF is a Hold and HWGG is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 02, 2025
Stock price -- (FGETF: $8.10 vs. HWGG: $6.49)
Brand notoriety: FGETF and HWGG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Consumer Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FGETF: 77% vs. HWGG: 513%
Market capitalization -- FGETF: $3.06B vs. HWGG: $5B
FGETF [@Other Consumer Services] is valued at $3.06B. HWGG’s [@Other Consumer Services] market capitalization is $5B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Consumer Services] industry ranges from $121.92B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Consumer Services] industry is $9.84B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FGETF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHWGG’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FGETF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HWGG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FGETF is a better buy in the long-term than HWGG.

Price Growth

FGETF (@Other Consumer Services) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while HWGG (@Other Consumer Services) price change was +29.80% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Consumer Services industry was +0.90%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.51%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.64%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Consumer Services (+0.90% weekly)

Other consumer services include companies that provide consumer services, and are not classified elsewhere. Travel fare aggregators, hotel bookings, consumer-to-consumer or business-to-business sales platforms are some examples of services that can be clubbed into this category. Many of such services have expanded online. Booking Holdings Inc, The Priceline Group Inc, and eBay Inc. are some major operators in this segment.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HWGG($5B) has a higher market cap than FGETF($3.07B). HWGG YTD gains are higher at: 117.785 vs. FGETF (-43.909). FGETF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 437M vs. HWGG (-3.47M). FGETF has more cash in the bank: 1.36B vs. HWGG (1.16M). HWGG has less debt than FGETF: HWGG (37K) vs FGETF (1.28B). FGETF has higher revenues than HWGG: FGETF (2.57B) vs HWGG (389K).
FGETFHWGGFGETF / HWGG
Capitalization3.07B5B61%
EBITDA437M-3.47M-12,590%
Gain YTD-43.909117.785-37%
P/E Ratio97.81N/A-
Revenue2.57B389K659,640%
Total Cash1.36B1.16M117,632%
Total Debt1.28B37K3,470,270%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FGETF vs HWGG: Fundamental Ratings
FGETF
HWGG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3393
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
17
Undervalued
98
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
93100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8859
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
84100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3030

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FGETF's Valuation (17) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for HWGG (98). This means that FGETF’s stock grew significantly faster than HWGG’s over the last 12 months.

FGETF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as HWGG (100). This means that FGETF’s stock grew similarly to HWGG’s over the last 12 months.

FGETF's SMR Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as HWGG (100). This means that FGETF’s stock grew similarly to HWGG’s over the last 12 months.

HWGG's Price Growth Rating (59) in the null industry is in the same range as FGETF (88). This means that HWGG’s stock grew similarly to FGETF’s over the last 12 months.

FGETF's P/E Growth Rating (84) in the null industry is in the same range as HWGG (100). This means that FGETF’s stock grew similarly to HWGG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BMICX9.45N/A
N/A
BlackRock Managed Income Investor C
OSPSX9.62N/A
N/A
Invesco SteelPath MLP Select 40 R6
LBGAX39.30N/A
N/A
ClearBridge Mid Cap Growth A
ERSMX30.45N/A
N/A
Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap R
ALMRX22.68N/A
N/A
Alger Mid Cap Growth Institutional I

FGETF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FGETF and HWGG have been poorly correlated (+5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FGETF and HWGG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FGETF
1D Price
Change %
FGETF100%
N/A
HWGG - FGETF
5%
Poorly correlated
+41.09%
WW - FGETF
2%
Poorly correlated
-5.61%
TCOM - FGETF
2%
Poorly correlated
+0.66%
CTMLF - FGETF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GDDFF - FGETF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

HWGG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HWGG and EDDRF have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HWGG and EDDRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HWGG
1D Price
Change %
HWGG100%
+41.09%
EDDRF - HWGG
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DRTGF - HWGG
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FGETF - HWGG
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FTDR - HWGG
1%
Poorly correlated
+13.18%
CTMLF - HWGG
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More