Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGFAX vs VFWPX
FGFAX vs VFWPX Comparison
Open Charts FGFAX vs VFWPX
Federated Hermes International Leaders A
Price$44.47
Change+$0.21 (+0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.51B
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US Idx Ins Plus
Price$145.26
Change+$0.53 (+0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets68.11B
FGFAX vs VFWPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGFAX vs. VFWPX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGFAX is a Buy and VFWPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFWPX has more cash in the bank: 68.1B vs. FGFAX (1.51B). VFWPX pays higher dividends than FGFAX: VFWPX (2.79) vs FGFAX (1.27). FGFAX was incepted earlier than VFWPX: FGFAX (27 years) vs VFWPX (15 years). FGFAX (1.23) is less costly to investors than VFWPX (0.03). FGFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. VFWPX (5.00). FGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFWPX: FGFAX (1500) vs VFWPX (100000000). VFWPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.10 vs. FGFAX (12.41). VFWPX return over 5 years is better than : 37.84 vs. FGFAX (28.39).
| FGFAX | VFWPX | FGFAX / VFWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.09 | 0.03 | 3,633% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 0.03 | 4,100% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 25.882 | 21.207 | 122% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 100000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.51B | 68.1B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.27 | 2.79 | 46% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.41 | 14.10 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.20 | 42.19 | 121% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.39 | 37.84 | 75% |
| Returns for 10 years | 52.70 | 66.46 | 79% |