Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGFCX vs VFWPX
FGFCX vs VFWPX Comparison
Open Charts FGFCX vs VFWPX
Federated Hermes International Leaders C
Price$40.47
Change-$0.18 (-0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.51B
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US Idx Ins Plus
Price$149.48
Change+$0.40 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.34B
FGFCX vs VFWPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGFCX vs. VFWPX commentary
Sep 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGFCX is a Buy and VFWPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFWPX has more cash in the bank: 71.3B vs. FGFCX (1.51B). VFWPX pays higher dividends than FGFCX: VFWPX (2.68) vs FGFCX (0.65). FGFCX was incepted earlier than VFWPX: FGFCX (27 years) vs VFWPX (15 years). FGFCX (1.98) is less costly to investors than VFWPX (0.03). FGFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. VFWPX (5.00). FGFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFWPX: FGFCX (1500) vs VFWPX (100000000). VFWPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.47 vs. FGFCX (15.66). VFWPX return over 5 years is better than : 44.05 vs. FGFCX (24.45).
| FGFCX | VFWPX | FGFCX / VFWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 0.03 | 6,333% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.98 | 0.03 | 6,600% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 26.786 | 24.850 | 108% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 100000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.51B | 71.3B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.65 | 2.68 | 24% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.66 | 18.47 | 85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.93 | 52.30 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.45 | 44.05 | 56% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.13 | 73.94 | 61% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement