Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGFCX vs VFWPX
FGFCX vs VFWPX Comparison
Open Charts FGFCX vs VFWPX
Federated Hermes International Leaders C
Price$41.49
Change-$0.41 (-0.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.57B
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US Idx Ins Plus
Price$150.08
Change-$1.21 (-0.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.16B
FGFCX vs VFWPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGFCX vs. VFWPX commentary
Oct 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGFCX is a Buy and VFWPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFWPX has more cash in the bank: 74.2B vs. FGFCX (1.57B). VFWPX pays higher dividends than FGFCX: VFWPX (2.74) vs FGFCX (0.64). FGFCX was incepted earlier than VFWPX: FGFCX (27 years) vs VFWPX (15 years). FGFCX (1.98) is less costly to investors than VFWPX (0.03). FGFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. VFWPX (5.00). FGFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFWPX: FGFCX (1500) vs VFWPX (100000000). FGFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.75 vs. VFWPX (17.65). VFWPX return over 5 years is better than : 44.38 vs. FGFCX (27.05).
| FGFCX | VFWPX | FGFCX / VFWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 0.03 | 6,333% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.98 | 0.03 | 6,600% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 31.266 | 26.867 | 116% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 100000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.57B | 74.2B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.64 | 2.74 | 23% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.75 | 17.65 | 112% |
| Returns for 3 years | 67.75 | 66.47 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.05 | 44.38 | 61% |
| Returns for 10 years | 47.43 | 70.72 | 67% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement