Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGFCX vs VFWPX
FGFCX vs VFWPX Comparison
Open Charts FGFCX vs VFWPX
Federated Hermes International Leaders C
Price$39.50
Change+$0.50 (+1.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.43B
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US Idx Ins Plus
Price$142.45
Change+$1.23 (+0.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets68.11B
FGFCX vs VFWPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGFCX vs. VFWPX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGFCX is a Hold and VFWPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFWPX has more cash in the bank: 68.1B vs. FGFCX (1.43B). VFWPX pays higher dividends than FGFCX: VFWPX (2.79) vs FGFCX (0.68). FGFCX was incepted earlier than VFWPX: FGFCX (27 years) vs VFWPX (15 years). FGFCX (1.98) is less costly to investors than VFWPX (0.03). FGFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. VFWPX (5.00). FGFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFWPX: FGFCX (1500) vs VFWPX (100000000). VFWPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.68 vs. FGFCX (17.49). VFWPX return over 5 years is better than : 38.81 vs. FGFCX (21.35).
| FGFCX | VFWPX | FGFCX / VFWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 0.03 | 6,333% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.98 | 0.03 | 6,600% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.180 | 18.267 | 121% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 100000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.43B | 68.1B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.68 | 2.79 | 24% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.49 | 19.68 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.24 | 35.13 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.35 | 38.81 | 55% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.09 | 49.21 | 53% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement