FGFH
Price
$32.00
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
115.39M
FINN
Price
$13000.00
Change
+$46.00 (+0.36%)
Updated
Aug 25 closing price
Capitalization
3.52B
Interact to see
Advertisement

FGFH vs FINN

Header iconFGFH vs FINN Comparison
Open Charts FGFH vs FINNBanner chart's image
Foresight Financial Group
Price$32.00
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.24K
Capitalization115.39M
First National of Nebraska
Price$13000.00
Change+$46.00 (+0.36%)
Volume$6
Capitalization3.52B
FGFH vs FINN Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FGFH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FINN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FGFH vs. FINN commentary
Aug 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGFH is a Buy and FINN is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 29, 2025
Stock price -- (FGFH: $32.00 vs. FINN: $13000.00)
Brand notoriety: FGFH and FINN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FGFH: 44% vs. FINN: 153%
Market capitalization -- FGFH: $115.39M vs. FINN: $3.52B
FGFH [@Regional Banks] is valued at $115.39M. FINN’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $3.52B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $167.72B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.85B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FGFH’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFINN’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FGFH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FINN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FINN is a better buy in the long-term than FGFH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FGFH’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FINN’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FGFH’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FINN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FGFH is a better buy in the short-term than FINN.

Price Growth

FGFH (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.27% price change this week, while FINN (@Regional Banks) price change was +1.09% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.77%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.21% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FINN($3.52B) has a higher market cap than FGFH($115M). FINN has higher P/E ratio than FGFH: FINN (8.47) vs FGFH (6.65). FINN YTD gains are higher at: 7.585 vs. FGFH (-1.175). FGFH has less debt than FINN: FGFH (39.9M) vs FINN (534M). FINN has higher revenues than FGFH: FINN (2.37B) vs FGFH (57M).
FGFHFINNFGFH / FINN
Capitalization115M3.52B3%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-1.1757.585-15%
P/E Ratio6.658.4779%
Revenue57M2.37B2%
Total Cash28MN/A-
Total Debt39.9M534M7%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FGFH vs FINN: Fundamental Ratings
FGFH
FINN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3484
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
25
Undervalued
32
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5131
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5553
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FGFH's Valuation (25) in the null industry is in the same range as FINN (32). This means that FGFH’s stock grew similarly to FINN’s over the last 12 months.

FINN's Profit vs Risk Rating (31) in the null industry is in the same range as FGFH (51). This means that FINN’s stock grew similarly to FGFH’s over the last 12 months.

FINN's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as FGFH (100). This means that FINN’s stock grew similarly to FGFH’s over the last 12 months.

FINN's Price Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as FGFH (55). This means that FINN’s stock grew similarly to FGFH’s over the last 12 months.

FINN's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as FGFH (100). This means that FINN’s stock grew similarly to FGFH’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FGFHFINN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
25%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
18%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
31%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
30%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
24%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
18%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
22%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
27%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
32%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
29%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
20%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
27%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
15%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
27%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
13%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
31%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
27%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FGFH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FINN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TIGCF0.240.01
+4.01%
Triumph Gold Corp
SMEGF107.001.95
+1.86%
Siemens Energy AG
BEOB90.751.00
+1.11%
BEO Bancorp
SRHBY9.63N/A
N/A
Starhub, Ltd.
NWOEF4.64N/A
N/A
New Oriental Education & Technology Group, Inc.

FGFH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FGFH and MVLY have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FGFH and MVLY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FGFH
1D Price
Change %
FGFH100%
N/A
MVLY - FGFH
33%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BNMDF - FGFH
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VWFB - FGFH
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
INFT - FGFH
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
INBK - FGFH
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.16%
More