FGFH
Price
$31.65
Change
+$0.05 (+0.16%)
Updated
Aug 22 closing price
Capitalization
114.13M
VWFB
Price
$11.20
Change
-$0.10 (-0.88%)
Updated
Aug 25 closing price
Capitalization
21.41M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FGFH vs VWFB

Header iconFGFH vs VWFB Comparison
Open Charts FGFH vs VWFBBanner chart's image
Foresight Financial Group
Price$31.65
Change+$0.05 (+0.16%)
Volume$10.43K
Capitalization114.13M
VWF Ban
Price$11.20
Change-$0.10 (-0.88%)
Volume$1.35K
Capitalization21.41M
FGFH vs VWFB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FGFH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VWFB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FGFH vs. VWFB commentary
Aug 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGFH is a Buy and VWFB is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 26, 2025
Stock price -- (FGFH: $31.65 vs. VWFB: $11.20)
Brand notoriety: FGFH and VWFB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FGFH: 471% vs. VWFB: 59%
Market capitalization -- FGFH: $114.13M vs. VWFB: $21.41M
FGFH [@Regional Banks] is valued at $114.13M. VWFB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $21.41M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $172.57B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.02B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FGFH’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileVWFB’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FGFH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • VWFB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FGFH is a better buy in the long-term than VWFB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FGFH’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VWFB’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FGFH’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • VWFB’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FGFH is a better buy in the short-term than VWFB.

Price Growth

FGFH (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.32% price change this week, while VWFB (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.88% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.89%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.37%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.69%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.89% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FGFH($114M) has a higher market cap than VWFB($21.4M). FGFH YTD gains are higher at: -2.256 vs. VWFB (-25.284). VWFB has less debt than FGFH: VWFB (31.9M) vs FGFH (39.9M). FGFH has higher revenues than VWFB: FGFH (57M) vs VWFB (4.98M).
FGFHVWFBFGFH / VWFB
Capitalization114M21.4M533%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-2.256-25.2849%
P/E Ratio6.58N/A-
Revenue57M4.98M1,146%
Total Cash28MN/A-
Total Debt39.9M31.9M125%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FGFH: Fundamental Ratings
FGFH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
30
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
25
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
52
SMR RATING
1..100
53
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
56
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
56
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FGFHVWFB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
29%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
21%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
29%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
28%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
32%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
33%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
33%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
27%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
27%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
51%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
25%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
38%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
31%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FGFH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VWFB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ZEOOF9.35N/A
N/A
Zeon Corp.
AAFRF3.02N/A
N/A
Airtel Africa Plc
NVLPF0.24N/A
N/A
Nova Leap Health Corp.
ALSUF2.00N/A
N/A
Alpha Star Acquisition Corporation
PLLTL0.08N/A
-1.69%
Piedmont Lithium Inc.

FGFH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FGFH and MVLY have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FGFH and MVLY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FGFH
1D Price
Change %
FGFH100%
N/A
MVLY - FGFH
33%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BNMDF - FGFH
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VWFB - FGFH
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.84%
INFT - FGFH
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
INBK - FGFH
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.30%
More

VWFB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that VWFB and AOZOY have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that VWFB and AOZOY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VWFB
1D Price
Change %
VWFB100%
-0.84%
AOZOY - VWFB
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FBSI - VWFB
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OTPBF - VWFB
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FSGB - VWFB
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FGFH - VWFB
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More