FGFPP
Price
$16.00
Change
+$0.30 (+1.91%)
Updated
Apr 1 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
SLF
Price
$58.77
Change
+$0.68 (+1.17%)
Updated
Apr 2 closing price
Capitalization
31.65B
35 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FGFPP vs SLF

Header iconFGFPP vs SLF Comparison
Open Charts FGFPP vs SLFBanner chart's image
Fundamental Global
Price$16.00
Change+$0.30 (+1.91%)
Volume$973
CapitalizationN/A
Sun Life Financial
Price$58.77
Change+$0.68 (+1.17%)
Volume$339.56K
Capitalization31.65B
FGFPP vs SLF Comparison Chart
Loading...
SLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FGFPP vs. SLF commentary
Apr 03, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGFPP is a StrongBuy and SLF is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 03, 2025
Stock price -- (FGFPP: $16.00 vs. SLF: $58.77)
Brand notoriety: FGFPP and SLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Multi-Line Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FGFPP: 47% vs. SLF: 35%
Market capitalization -- FGFPP: $0 vs. SLF: $31.65B
FGFPP [@Multi-Line Insurance] is valued at $0. SLF’s [@Multi-Line Insurance] market capitalization is $31.65B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Multi-Line Insurance] industry ranges from $634.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Multi-Line Insurance] industry is $21.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FGFPP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSLF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FGFPP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SLF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SLF is a better buy in the long-term than FGFPP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SLF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • SLF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

FGFPP (@Multi-Line Insurance) experienced а -0.62% price change this week, while SLF (@Multi-Line Insurance) price change was +2.78% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Multi-Line Insurance industry was -0.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.73%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.35%.

Reported Earning Dates

SLF is expected to report earnings on May 08, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Multi-Line Insurance (-0.19% weekly)

A multi-line insurance contract bundles together exposures to risk and covers them under a single contract. For providers of such policies, the bundle is a potential risk diversification strategy since their exposure gets spread over several factors, which helps them mitigate a financial burden if a catastrophic event were to occur. Other potential benefits include getting more premiums from including more than one type of insurance in a bundle, and getting a competitive edge by procuring multiple insurance contracts with a customer. Examples of companies in this industry are Berkshire Hathaway (which owns several insurance companies), Chubb Limited, American International Group, Inc. and Sun Life Financial Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FGFPP YTD gains are higher at: 6.585 vs. SLF (-0.961). SLF has more cash in the bank: 27.5B vs. FGFPP (2.4M). FGFPP has less debt than SLF: FGFPP (387K) vs SLF (13.3B). SLF has higher revenues than FGFPP: SLF (32.7B) vs FGFPP (23.7M).
FGFPPSLFFGFPP / SLF
CapitalizationN/A31.6B-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD6.585-0.961-686%
P/E RatioN/A13.86-
Revenue23.7M32.7B0%
Total Cash2.4M27.5B0%
Total Debt387K13.3B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FGFPP vs SLF: Fundamental Ratings
FGFPP
SLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
861
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
1
Undervalued
35
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10033
SMR RATING
1..100
10099
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5250
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10031
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FGFPP's Valuation (1) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SLF (35) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that FGFPP’s stock grew somewhat faster than SLF’s over the last 12 months.

SLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (33) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is significantly better than the same rating for FGFPP (100) in the null industry. This means that SLF’s stock grew significantly faster than FGFPP’s over the last 12 months.

SLF's SMR Rating (99) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as FGFPP (100) in the null industry. This means that SLF’s stock grew similarly to FGFPP’s over the last 12 months.

SLF's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as FGFPP (52) in the null industry. This means that SLF’s stock grew similarly to FGFPP’s over the last 12 months.

SLF's P/E Growth Rating (31) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is significantly better than the same rating for FGFPP (100) in the null industry. This means that SLF’s stock grew significantly faster than FGFPP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
39%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
49%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
51%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
39%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
SLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MKGCX26.290.11
+0.42%
BlackRock Advantage Global K
RYESX196.52N/A
N/A
Rydex Energy Services A
GIEZX14.79N/A
N/A
GuideStone Funds International Eq Inv
FRIFX12.26N/A
N/A
Fidelity Real Estate Income
PJEAX15.43N/A
N/A
PGIM US Real Estate A

FGFPP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FGFPP and EQH have been poorly correlated (+6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FGFPP and EQH's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FGFPP
1D Price
Change %
FGFPP100%
N/A
EQH - FGFPP
6%
Poorly correlated
+5.05%
SLF - FGFPP
4%
Poorly correlated
+1.17%
ACGL - FGFPP
4%
Poorly correlated
+0.71%
AIG - FGFPP
1%
Poorly correlated
+1.05%
ACGLN - FGFPP
-0%
Poorly correlated
+0.06%
More

SLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SLF has been loosely correlated with HIG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SLF jumps, then HIG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SLF
1D Price
Change %
SLF100%
+1.17%
HIG - SLF
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.38%
AVVIY - SLF
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.89%
AXAHY - SLF
43%
Loosely correlated
+1.67%
FIHL - SLF
42%
Loosely correlated
+1.28%
ALIZY - SLF
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.73%
More