Advertisement
ORI vs SLF
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Old Republic International (ORI) vs. Sun Life Financial (SLF) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- ORI and SLF operate in the insurance sector but differ in scale and focus, with SLF holding a larger market capitalization of approximately $46 billion compared to ORI’s roughly $10.5 billion.
- Recent market activity shows ORI delivering a 30% one-year total return while SLF posted approximately 39%, reflecting stronger momentum for the larger insurer amid broader equity gains.
- ORI reported second-quarter 2026 results in late July featuring revenue that exceeded expectations alongside a modest earnings miss, alongside new partnership announcements in specialty lines.
- SLF completed acquisitions, launched a private wealth platform, and added board expertise in recent weeks, with its second-quarter 2026 earnings scheduled for early August.
- Valuation metrics indicate ORI trades at a lower trailing price-to-earnings ratio near 9.5 versus SLF’s approximately 21.7, highlighting contrasting growth and stability profiles.
- Sector exposure centers on property-casualty and title insurance for ORI versus diversified life, health, wealth, and asset management for SLF, creating distinct risk and opportunity trade-offs.
Introduction
Market participants seeking to compare insurance-sector equities often examine stocks with overlapping yet differentiated business models. ORI and SLF provide such a pairing: one emphasizes U.S.-centric property-casualty and title coverage while the other offers diversified life, health, wealth, and asset-management solutions across multiple geographies. Investors and traders evaluating relative performance, valuation differentials, and recent catalysts may find this side-by-side analysis useful for portfolio construction or tactical allocation decisions within the financial-services space.
ORI Overview and Recent Performance
Old Republic International Corporation operates through specialty insurance and title insurance segments, underwriting commercial property-casualty risks and protecting real-estate titles primarily in North America. In recent market activity, the stock has exhibited resilience, posting a one-year total return near 30% as of late July 2026 despite a more modest year-to-date gain of approximately 1.8%. Second-quarter 2026 results released in late July showed revenue surpassing analyst expectations while earnings per share came in slightly below estimates; management highlighted ongoing premium growth alongside pressure in certain lines. Additional developments, including a national partnership with a veterans’ organization and prior acquisitions expanding agricultural coverage, contributed to sentiment during the period. The shares trade with a trailing price-to-earnings ratio around 9.5, reflecting the market’s assessment of its mature, lower-volatility profile relative to broader indices.
SLF Overview and Recent Performance
Sun Life Financial Inc. delivers life, health, wealth, and asset-management solutions to clients across Canada, the United States, Asia, and other regions. The stock has demonstrated robust recent performance, advancing roughly 39% over the trailing twelve months and nearly 35% year-to-date through late July 2026. Corporate activity remained elevated, with the completion of a U.S. multifamily asset-manager acquisition, the launch of an integrated private-wealth platform targeting high-net-worth individuals, and the appointment of an experienced executive to the board. Second-quarter 2026 earnings are slated for release in early August. Valuation metrics place the shares at a trailing price-to-earnings ratio near 21.7, consistent with expectations for diversified growth and international exposure.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates a selection of the platform’s most suitable automated trading strategies for prevailing market conditions. While Tickeron offers hundreds of AI trading bots that execute across thousands of tickers, only those demonstrating strong alignment with current trends, risk parameters, and performance statistics earn placement in this featured section. Available bots span a wide range of trading styles, timeframes, and statistical profiles, with metrics such as win rates, profit factors, and drawdown measures varying by strategy. This curated view allows market participants to review transparent performance data and explore bots suited to equities including ORI and SLF. Review the full selection at Trending AI Robots.
Head-to-Head Comparison
ORI and SLF share insurance-sector exposure yet diverge in business model and geographic reach. ORI concentrates on U.S. property-casualty and title lines, offering cyclical sensitivity to construction, transportation, and real-estate activity. SLF maintains a broader footprint encompassing life and health insurance, wealth management, and asset management across multiple continents, providing greater diversification. Recent momentum favors SLF on a total-return basis, while ORI presents a more compressed valuation. Risk factors include underwriting-cycle volatility for ORI versus interest-rate and international-market exposure for SLF. Market sentiment reflects these contrasts, with analysts maintaining generally neutral-to-positive ratings on both names amid ongoing capital-return programs and selective growth initiatives.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable trend consistency, earnings momentum, and relative positioning, Tickeron’s AI models currently assign a modestly higher probabilistic preference to SLF. The larger scale, diversified revenue streams, and recent strategic expansions appear to support more stable forward visibility compared with the narrower focus and mixed quarterly results at ORI. This assessment remains subject to evolving market data and should not be interpreted as investment advice.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ORI is a Hold and SLF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ORI’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSLF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- ORI’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- SLF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ORI’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SLF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- ORI’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- SLF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
ORI (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а -1.39% price change this week, while SLF (@Multi-Line Insurance) price change was -0.93% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was +0.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.85%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Multi-Line Insurance industry was -0.67%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.03%.
Reported Earning Dates
ORI is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.
SLF is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Property/Casualty Insurance (+0.43% weekly)Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.
@Multi-Line Insurance (-0.67% weekly)A multi-line insurance contract bundles together exposures to risk and covers them under a single contract. For providers of such policies, the bundle is a potential risk diversification strategy since their exposure gets spread over several factors, which helps them mitigate a financial burden if a catastrophic event were to occur. Other potential benefits include getting more premiums from including more than one type of insurance in a bundle, and getting a competitive edge by procuring multiple insurance contracts with a customer. Examples of companies in this industry are Berkshire Hathaway (which owns several insurance companies), Chubb Limited, American International Group, Inc. and Sun Life Financial Inc.
| ORI | SLF | ORI / SLF | |
| Capitalization | 10.1B | 44.1B | 23% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.348 | 27.388 | -5% |
| P/E Ratio | 9.18 | 18.69 | 49% |
| Revenue | 9.72B | 35.9B | 27% |
| Total Cash | 3.94B | 26.2B | 15% |
| Total Debt | 2.28B | 8.37B | 27% |
ORI | SLF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 78 | 60 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 19 Undervalued | 43 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 6 | 33 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 53 | 90 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 49 | 45 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 66 | 23 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ORI's Valuation (19) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as SLF (43) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that ORI’s stock grew similarly to SLF’s over the last 12 months.
ORI's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as SLF (33) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that ORI’s stock grew similarly to SLF’s over the last 12 months.
ORI's SMR Rating (53) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SLF (90) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that ORI’s stock grew somewhat faster than SLF’s over the last 12 months.
SLF's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as ORI (49) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that SLF’s stock grew similarly to ORI’s over the last 12 months.
SLF's P/E Growth Rating (23) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ORI (66) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that SLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ORI’s over the last 12 months.
| ORI | SLF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 47% | 2 days ago 44% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 58% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 47% | 2 days ago 44% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 38% | 2 days ago 40% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 37% | 2 days ago 51% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 30% | 2 days ago 48% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 56% | 7 days ago 48% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 41% | 2 days ago 52% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 46% | 2 days ago 56% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | 2 days ago 31% |
Advertisement