Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGFRX vs VFWPX
FGFRX vs VFWPX Comparison
Open Charts FGFRX vs VFWPX
Federated Hermes Intl Leaders R
Price$43.88
Change+$0.26 (+0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.47B
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US Idx Ins Plus
Price$145.32
Change+$0.81 (+0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.34B
FGFRX vs VFWPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGFRX vs. VFWPX commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGFRX is a Hold and VFWPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFWPX has more cash in the bank: 71.3B vs. FGFRX (1.47B). VFWPX pays higher dividends than FGFRX: VFWPX (2.68) vs FGFRX (1.10). FGFRX was incepted earlier than VFWPX: FGFRX (12 years) vs VFWPX (15 years). FGFRX (1.64) is less costly to investors than VFWPX (0.03). FGFRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. VFWPX (5.00). FGFRX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFWPX: FGFRX (0) vs VFWPX (100000000). VFWPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.96 vs. FGFRX (14.60). VFWPX return over 5 years is better than : 40.89 vs. FGFRX (29.74).
| FGFRX | VFWPX | FGFRX / VFWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 0.03 | 4,133% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 0.03 | 5,467% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 25.731 | 21.701 | 119% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.47B | 71.3B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 2.68 | 41% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.60 | 15.96 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.09 | 47.91 | 113% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.74 | 40.89 | 73% |
| Returns for 10 years | 53.32 | 69.76 | 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement