Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGFRX vs VFWPX
FGFRX vs VFWPX Comparison
Open Charts FGFRX vs VFWPX
Federated Hermes Intl Leaders R
Price$43.34
Change+$0.54 (+1.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.43B
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US Idx Ins Plus
Price$142.45
Change+$1.23 (+0.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets68.11B
FGFRX vs VFWPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGFRX vs. VFWPX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGFRX is a Hold and VFWPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFWPX has more cash in the bank: 68.1B vs. FGFRX (1.43B). VFWPX pays higher dividends than FGFRX: VFWPX (2.79) vs FGFRX (1.14). FGFRX was incepted earlier than VFWPX: FGFRX (12 years) vs VFWPX (15 years). FGFRX (1.64) is less costly to investors than VFWPX (0.03). FGFRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. VFWPX (5.00). FGFRX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFWPX: FGFRX (0) vs VFWPX (100000000). VFWPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.68 vs. FGFRX (18.46). VFWPX return over 5 years is better than : 38.81 vs. FGFRX (27.27).
| FGFRX | VFWPX | FGFRX / VFWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 0.03 | 4,133% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 0.03 | 5,467% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.636 | 18.267 | 124% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.43B | 68.1B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.14 | 2.79 | 41% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.46 | 19.68 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.56 | 35.13 | 115% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.27 | 38.81 | 70% |
| Returns for 10 years | 34.57 | 49.21 | 70% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement