Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGFRX vs VFWPX
FGFRX vs VFWPX Comparison
Open Charts FGFRX vs VFWPX
Federated Hermes Intl Leaders R
Price$44.96
Change-$0.70 (-1.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.52B
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US Idx Ins Plus
Price$148.50
Change-$0.42 (-0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.54B
FGFRX vs VFWPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGFRX vs. VFWPX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGFRX is a Hold and VFWPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFWPX has more cash in the bank: 75.5B vs. FGFRX (1.52B). VFWPX pays higher dividends than FGFRX: VFWPX (2.70) vs FGFRX (1.06). FGFRX was incepted earlier than VFWPX: FGFRX (12 years) vs VFWPX (15 years). FGFRX (1.64) is less costly to investors than VFWPX (0.03). FGFRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. VFWPX (5.00). FGFRX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFWPX: FGFRX (0) vs VFWPX (100000000). FGFRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.67 vs. VFWPX (21.62). VFWPX return over 5 years is better than : 33.14 vs. FGFRX (22.65).
| FGFRX | VFWPX | FGFRX / VFWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 0.03 | 4,133% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 0.03 | 5,467% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 28.825 | 24.879 | 116% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.52B | 75.5B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.06 | 2.70 | 39% |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.67 | 21.62 | 114% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.75 | 45.59 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.65 | 33.14 | 68% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.65 | 69.04 | 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement