Ad is loading...
FGFRX vs VFWPX
FGFRX vs VFWPX Comparison
Open Charts FGFRX vs VFWPX
Federated Hermes Intl Leaders R
Price$37.06
Change+$0.59 (+1.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.24B
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US Idx Ins Plus
Price$121.83
Change+$2.98 (+2.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets59.54B
FGFRX vs VFWPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGFRX vs. VFWPX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGFRX is a Hold and VFWPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFWPX has more cash in the bank: 59.5B vs. FGFRX (1.24B). VFWPX pays higher dividends than FGFRX: VFWPX (3.04) vs FGFRX (1.25). FGFRX was incepted earlier than VFWPX: FGFRX (12 years) vs VFWPX (14 years). FGFRX (1.64) is less costly to investors than VFWPX (0.03). FGFRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. VFWPX (5.00). FGFRX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFWPX: FGFRX (0) vs VFWPX (100000000). FGFRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.74 vs. VFWPX (-1.35). VFWPX return over 5 years is better than : 38.53 vs. FGFRX (35.03).
| FGFRX | VFWPX | FGFRX / VFWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 0.03 | 4,133% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 0.03 | 5,467% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.499 | -0.635 | -708% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.24B | 59.5B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.25 | 3.04 | 41% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.74 | -1.35 | 55% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.75 | 4.06 | 339% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.03 | 38.53 | 91% |
| Returns for 10 years | 15.82 | 20.72 | 76% |