Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGHMX vs FTUCX
FGHMX vs FTUCX Comparison
Open Charts FGHMX vs FTUCX
Fidelity Advisor Communication ServicesC
Price$133.27
Change-$1.27 (-0.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.52B
Fidelity Advisor Telecommunications C
Price$59.71
Change-$0.18 (-0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets233.28M
FGHMX vs FTUCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGHMX vs. FTUCX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGHMX is a Buy and FTUCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FGHMX has more cash in the bank: 2.52B vs. FTUCX (233M). FTUCX pays higher dividends than FGHMX: FTUCX (1.04) vs FGHMX (0.00). FGHMX was incepted earlier than FTUCX: FGHMX (7 years) vs FTUCX (19 years). FTUCX (1.80) is less costly to investors than FGHMX (1.71). FGHMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. FTUCX (40.00). FGHMX (0) and FTUCX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FGHMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 33.62 vs. FTUCX (15.48). FGHMX return over 5 years is better than : 89.71 vs. FTUCX (-3.91).
| FGHMX | FTUCX | FGHMX / FTUCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.71 | 1.80 | 95% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.71 | 1.80 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 28.085 | 12.997 | 216% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 500 | - |
| Net Assets | 2.52B | 233M | 1,081% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.04 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 33.62 | 15.48 | 217% |
| Returns for 3 years | 144.31 | 51.26 | 282% |
| Returns for 5 years | 89.71 | -3.91 | -2,294% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 9.49 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement