Ad is loading...
FGINX vs RMFCX
FGINX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts FGINX vs RMFCX
Macquarie Growth and Income A
Price$15.13
Change+$0.12 (+0.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net AssetsN/A
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$55.77
Change+$0.30 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets103.41B
FGINX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGINX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGINX is a StrongBuy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FGINX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: FGINX (2.05) vs RMFCX (1.69). FGINX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: FGINX (31 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). FGINX (26.00) and RMFCX (25.00) have comparable annual turnover. RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGINX: RMFCX (250) vs FGINX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.43 vs. FGINX (10.31). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 37.82 vs. FGINX (14.28).
| FGINX | RMFCX | FGINX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.129 | 2.162 | 191% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | N/A | 103B | - |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.05 | 1.69 | 121% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.31 | 12.43 | 83% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.73 | 12.60 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.28 | 37.82 | 38% |
| Returns for 10 years | -21.27 | 65.18 | -33% |