Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGINX vs RMFCX
FGINX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts FGINX vs RMFCX
Macquarie Growth and Income A
Price$17.08
Change-$0.03 (-0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.51B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$62.20
Change+$0.11 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.47B
FGINX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGINX vs. RMFCX commentary
Oct 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGINX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. FGINX (1.51B). FGINX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: FGINX (1.63) vs RMFCX (1.20). FGINX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: FGINX (32 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). FGINX (1.02) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). FGINX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGINX: RMFCX (250) vs FGINX (1000). FGINX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.15 vs. RMFCX (7.44). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 60.80 vs. FGINX (52.40).
| FGINX | RMFCX | FGINX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.91 | 112% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.91 | 112% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.274 | 14.964 | 129% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.51B | 112B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.63 | 1.20 | 135% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.15 | 7.44 | 110% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.58 | 43.84 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.40 | 60.80 | 86% |
| Returns for 10 years | -8.14 | 94.21 | -9% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement