Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGINX vs RMFCX
FGINX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts FGINX vs RMFCX
Macquarie Growth and Income A
Price$16.73
Change-$0.06 (-0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.49B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$60.45
Change+$0.07 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.34B
FGINX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGINX vs. RMFCX commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGINX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. FGINX (1.49B). FGINX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: FGINX (1.73) vs RMFCX (1.24). FGINX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: FGINX (32 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). FGINX (1.02) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). FGINX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGINX: RMFCX (250) vs FGINX (1000). FGINX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.61 vs. RMFCX (7.71). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 56.41 vs. FGINX (47.93).
| FGINX | RMFCX | FGINX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.91 | 112% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.91 | 112% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.154 | 11.421 | 141% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.49B | 109B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.73 | 1.24 | 140% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.61 | 7.71 | 125% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.72 | 32.16 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.93 | 56.41 | 85% |
| Returns for 10 years | -9.31 | 91.12 | -10% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement