Ad is loading...
FGINX vs RMFCX
FGINX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts FGINX vs RMFCX
Macquarie Growth and Income A
Price$14.58
Change-$0.65 (-4.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.41B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$54.14
Change-$1.81 (-3.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets102.75B
FGINX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGINX vs. RMFCX commentary
Apr 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGINX is a Hold and RMFCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 103B vs. FGINX (1.41B). FGINX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: FGINX (2.03) vs RMFCX (1.34). FGINX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: FGINX (32 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). FGINX (1.02) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. FGINX (26.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGINX: RMFCX (250) vs FGINX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.77 vs. FGINX (0.31). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 76.10 vs. FGINX (64.43).
| FGINX | RMFCX | FGINX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.91 | 112% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.91 | 112% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.337 | 2.814 | 190% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.41B | 103B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.03 | 1.34 | 151% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.31 | 6.77 | 5% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.69 | 11.46 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | 64.43 | 76.10 | 85% |
| Returns for 10 years | -24.34 | 64.62 | -38% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...