Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGINX vs RMFCX
FGINX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts FGINX vs RMFCX
Macquarie Growth and Income A
Price$16.28
Change-$0.08 (-0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.47B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$60.07
Change-$0.15 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.9B
FGINX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGINX vs. RMFCX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGINX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 110B vs. FGINX (1.47B). FGINX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: FGINX (1.82) vs RMFCX (1.26). FGINX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: FGINX (32 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). FGINX (1.02) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). FGINX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGINX: RMFCX (250) vs FGINX (1000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.77 vs. FGINX (6.86). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 54.95 vs. FGINX (43.60).
| FGINX | RMFCX | FGINX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.91 | 112% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.91 | 112% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.030 | 10.721 | 122% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.47B | 110B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.82 | 1.26 | 145% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.86 | 7.77 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.47 | 22.69 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.60 | 54.95 | 79% |
| Returns for 10 years | -16.68 | 79.02 | -21% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers