Ad is loading...
FGINX vs RMFEX
FGINX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts FGINX vs RMFEX
Macquarie Growth and Income A
Price$14.58
Change-$0.65 (-4.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.41B
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$54.47
Change-$1.82 (-3.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets102.75B
FGINX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGINX vs. RMFEX commentary
Apr 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGINX is a Hold and RMFEX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 103B vs. FGINX (1.41B). FGINX pays higher dividends than RMFEX: FGINX (2.03) vs RMFEX (1.61). FGINX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: FGINX (32 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). FGINX (1.02) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). RMFEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. FGINX (26.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGINX: RMFEX (250) vs FGINX (1000). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.10 vs. FGINX (0.31). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 78.86 vs. FGINX (64.43).
| FGINX | RMFEX | FGINX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.62 | 165% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.62 | 165% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.337 | 2.891 | 185% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.41B | 103B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.03 | 1.61 | 126% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.31 | 7.10 | 4% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.69 | 12.51 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 64.43 | 78.86 | 82% |
| Returns for 10 years | -24.34 | 70.99 | -34% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...