Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGINX vs RMFEX
FGINX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts FGINX vs RMFEX
Macquarie Growth and Income A
Price$17.08
Change-$0.03 (-0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.51B
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$62.58
Change+$0.10 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.47B
FGINX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGINX vs. RMFEX commentary
Oct 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGINX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. FGINX (1.51B). FGINX pays higher dividends than RMFEX: FGINX (1.63) vs RMFEX (1.46). FGINX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: FGINX (32 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). FGINX (1.02) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). FGINX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGINX: RMFEX (250) vs FGINX (1000). FGINX (8.15) and RMFEX (7.77) have marching annual gain over last year. RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 63.30 vs. FGINX (52.40).
| FGINX | RMFEX | FGINX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.62 | 165% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.62 | 165% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.274 | 15.212 | 127% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.51B | 112B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.63 | 1.46 | 111% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.15 | 7.77 | 105% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.58 | 45.19 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 52.40 | 63.30 | 83% |
| Returns for 10 years | -8.14 | 101.97 | -8% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement