Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGINX vs RMFEX
FGINX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts FGINX vs RMFEX
Macquarie Growth and Income A
Price$16.73
Change-$0.06 (-0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.49B
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$60.85
Change+$0.06 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.34B
FGINX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGINX vs. RMFEX commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGINX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. FGINX (1.49B). FGINX pays higher dividends than RMFEX: FGINX (1.73) vs RMFEX (1.49). FGINX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: FGINX (32 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). FGINX (1.02) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). FGINX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGINX: RMFEX (250) vs FGINX (1000). FGINX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.61 vs. RMFEX (8.06). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 58.84 vs. FGINX (47.93).
| FGINX | RMFEX | FGINX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.62 | 165% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.62 | 165% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.154 | 11.638 | 139% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.49B | 109B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.73 | 1.49 | 116% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.61 | 8.06 | 119% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.72 | 33.39 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.93 | 58.84 | 81% |
| Returns for 10 years | -9.31 | 98.59 | -9% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement