Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGIPX vs RMEBX
FGIPX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts FGIPX vs RMEBX
Macquarie Growth and Income Instl
Price$16.71
Change-$0.07 (-0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.49B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$60.71
Change+$0.28 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.34B
FGIPX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGIPX vs. RMEBX commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGIPX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. FGIPX (1.49B). FGIPX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: FGIPX (2.01) vs RMEBX (1.09). FGIPX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: FGIPX (12 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than FGIPX (0.77). FGIPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). FGIPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: FGIPX (0) vs RMEBX (250). FGIPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.83 vs. RMEBX (7.45). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 55.11 vs. FGIPX (48.73).
| FGIPX | RMEBX | FGIPX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.07 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.07 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.295 | 11.179 | 146% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.49B | 109B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.01 | 1.09 | 185% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.83 | 7.45 | 132% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.36 | 31.44 | 112% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.73 | 55.11 | 88% |
| Returns for 10 years | -7.16 | 89.18 | -8% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement