Ad is loading...
FGIPX vs RMEBX
FGIPX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts FGIPX vs RMEBX
Macquarie Growth and Income Instl
Price$15.21
Change+$0.08 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.41B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$56.09
Change+$0.08 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets102.3B
FGIPX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGIPX vs. RMEBX commentary
Apr 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGIPX is a StrongBuy and RMEBX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 102B vs. FGIPX (1.41B). FGIPX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: FGIPX (2.32) vs RMEBX (1.18). FGIPX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: FGIPX (12 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than FGIPX (0.77). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. FGIPX (26.00). FGIPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: FGIPX (0) vs RMEBX (250). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.40 vs. FGIPX (-0.50). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 72.81 vs. FGIPX (62.84).
| FGIPX | RMEBX | FGIPX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.07 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.07 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.805 | 2.445 | 197% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.41B | 102B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.32 | 1.18 | 196% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.50 | 5.40 | -9% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.39 | 10.70 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 62.84 | 72.81 | 86% |
| Returns for 10 years | -22.39 | 63.71 | -35% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...