Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGIPX vs RMEBX
FGIPX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts FGIPX vs RMEBX
Macquarie Growth and Income Instl
Price$15.04
Change-$0.04 (-0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.42B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$56.32
Change-$0.14 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets104.75B
FGIPX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGIPX vs. RMEBX commentary
May 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGIPX is a StrongBuy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 105B vs. FGIPX (1.42B). FGIPX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: FGIPX (2.38) vs RMEBX (1.21). FGIPX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: FGIPX (12 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than FGIPX (0.77). FGIPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). FGIPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: FGIPX (0) vs RMEBX (250). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.12 vs. FGIPX (2.20). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 58.45 vs. FGIPX (46.27).
| FGIPX | RMEBX | FGIPX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.07 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.07 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.260 | 3.121 | 201% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.42B | 105B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.38 | 1.21 | 197% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.20 | 5.12 | 43% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.97 | 19.95 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.27 | 58.45 | 79% |
| Returns for 10 years | -24.22 | 60.74 | -40% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement