Ad is loading...
FGIPX vs RMEBX
FGIPX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts FGIPX vs RMEBX
Macquarie Growth and Income Instl
Price$14.50
Change+$0.21 (+1.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.32B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$54.03
Change+$0.72 (+1.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets97.26B
FGIPX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGIPX vs. RMEBX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGIPX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 97.3B vs. FGIPX (1.32B). FGIPX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: FGIPX (2.32) vs RMEBX (1.18). FGIPX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: FGIPX (12 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than FGIPX (0.77). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. FGIPX (26.00). FGIPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: FGIPX (0) vs RMEBX (250). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.70 vs. FGIPX (-3.48). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 53.15 vs. FGIPX (38.94).
| FGIPX | RMEBX | FGIPX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.07 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.07 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.013 | -1.317 | 77% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.32B | 97.3B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.32 | 1.18 | 196% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.48 | 3.70 | -94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.54 | 9.15 | 71% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.94 | 53.15 | 73% |
| Returns for 10 years | -27.99 | 54.60 | -51% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...