Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGIPX vs RMEBX
FGIPX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts FGIPX vs RMEBX
Macquarie Growth and Income Instl
Price$17.24
Change+$0.05 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.52B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$61.27
Change-$0.21 (-0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.19B
FGIPX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGIPX vs. RMEBX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGIPX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 110B vs. FGIPX (1.52B). FGIPX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: FGIPX (1.91) vs RMEBX (1.05). FGIPX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: FGIPX (13 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than FGIPX (0.77). FGIPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). FGIPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: FGIPX (0) vs RMEBX (250). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.45 vs. FGIPX (4.90). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 50.76 vs. FGIPX (44.56).
| FGIPX | RMEBX | FGIPX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.07 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.07 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.218 | 12.462 | 162% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.52B | 110B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.91 | 1.05 | 181% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.90 | 5.45 | 90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.15 | 27.22 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.56 | 50.76 | 88% |
| Returns for 10 years | -6.88 | 82.68 | -8% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement