Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGIPX vs RMEBX
FGIPX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts FGIPX vs RMEBX
Macquarie Growth and Income Instl
Price$16.26
Change-$0.08 (-0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.47B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$60.40
Change-$0.15 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.9B
FGIPX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGIPX vs. RMEBX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGIPX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 110B vs. FGIPX (1.47B). FGIPX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: FGIPX (2.11) vs RMEBX (1.11). FGIPX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: FGIPX (12 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than FGIPX (0.77). FGIPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). FGIPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: FGIPX (0) vs RMEBX (250). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.63 vs. FGIPX (7.08). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 53.85 vs. FGIPX (44.26).
| FGIPX | RMEBX | FGIPX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.07 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.07 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.163 | 10.612 | 124% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.47B | 110B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.11 | 1.11 | 191% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.08 | 7.63 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.07 | 22.19 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.26 | 53.85 | 82% |
| Returns for 10 years | -14.68 | 77.43 | -19% |