Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGIPX vs RMEBX
FGIPX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts FGIPX vs RMEBX
Macquarie Growth and Income Instl
Price$16.14
Change+$0.11 (+0.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.48B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$59.79
Change+$0.38 (+0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.01B
FGIPX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGIPX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jul 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGIPX is a StrongBuy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. FGIPX (1.48B). FGIPX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: FGIPX (2.10) vs RMEBX (1.12). FGIPX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: FGIPX (12 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than FGIPX (0.77). FGIPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). FGIPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: FGIPX (0) vs RMEBX (250). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.31 vs. FGIPX (7.88). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 60.65 vs. FGIPX (49.89).
| FGIPX | RMEBX | FGIPX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.07 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.07 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.328 | 9.495 | 130% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.48B | 109B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.10 | 1.12 | 188% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.88 | 11.31 | 70% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.66 | 28.70 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.89 | 60.65 | 82% |
| Returns for 10 years | -16.38 | 77.57 | -21% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement