Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGIPX vs RMFCX
FGIPX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts FGIPX vs RMFCX
Macquarie Growth and Income Instl
Price$16.71
Change-$0.07 (-0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.49B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$60.45
Change+$0.07 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.34B
FGIPX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGIPX vs. RMFCX commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGIPX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. FGIPX (1.49B). FGIPX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: FGIPX (2.01) vs RMFCX (1.24). FGIPX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: FGIPX (12 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than FGIPX (0.77). FGIPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). FGIPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: FGIPX (0) vs RMFCX (250). FGIPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.83 vs. RMFCX (7.71). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 56.41 vs. FGIPX (48.73).
| FGIPX | RMFCX | FGIPX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.91 | 85% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.91 | 85% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.295 | 11.421 | 143% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.49B | 109B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.01 | 1.24 | 163% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.83 | 7.71 | 127% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.36 | 32.16 | 110% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.73 | 56.41 | 86% |
| Returns for 10 years | -7.16 | 91.12 | -8% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement