Ad is loading...
FGIPX vs RMFCX
FGIPX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts FGIPX vs RMFCX
Macquarie Growth and Income Instl
Price$14.50
Change+$0.21 (+1.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.32B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$53.74
Change+$0.73 (+1.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets97.26B
FGIPX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGIPX vs. RMFCX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGIPX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 97.3B vs. FGIPX (1.32B). FGIPX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: FGIPX (2.32) vs RMFCX (1.34). FGIPX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: FGIPX (12 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than FGIPX (0.77). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. FGIPX (26.00). FGIPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: FGIPX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.87 vs. FGIPX (-3.48). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 54.30 vs. FGIPX (38.94).
| FGIPX | RMFCX | FGIPX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.91 | 85% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.91 | 85% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.013 | -1.247 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.32B | 97.3B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.32 | 1.34 | 173% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.48 | 3.87 | -90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.54 | 9.64 | 68% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.94 | 54.30 | 72% |
| Returns for 10 years | -27.99 | 55.97 | -50% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...