Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGIPX vs RMFCX
FGIPX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts FGIPX vs RMFCX
Macquarie Growth and Income Instl
Price$16.14
Change+$0.11 (+0.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.48B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$59.46
Change+$0.39 (+0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.01B
FGIPX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGIPX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jul 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGIPX is a StrongBuy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. FGIPX (1.48B). FGIPX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: FGIPX (2.10) vs RMFCX (1.27). FGIPX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: FGIPX (12 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than FGIPX (0.77). FGIPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). FGIPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFCX: FGIPX (0) vs RMFCX (250). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.47 vs. FGIPX (7.88). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 61.83 vs. FGIPX (49.89).
| FGIPX | RMFCX | FGIPX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.91 | 85% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.91 | 85% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.328 | 9.596 | 128% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.48B | 109B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.10 | 1.27 | 166% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.88 | 11.47 | 69% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.66 | 29.27 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.89 | 61.83 | 81% |
| Returns for 10 years | -16.38 | 79.21 | -21% |