Ad is loading...
FGIPX vs RMFEX
FGIPX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts FGIPX vs RMFEX
Macquarie Growth and Income Instl
Price$14.50
Change+$0.21 (+1.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.32B
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$54.07
Change+$0.73 (+1.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets97.26B
FGIPX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGIPX vs. RMFEX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGIPX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 97.3B vs. FGIPX (1.32B). FGIPX pays higher dividends than RMFEX: FGIPX (2.32) vs RMFEX (1.61). FGIPX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: FGIPX (12 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). FGIPX (0.77) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). RMFEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. FGIPX (26.00). FGIPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFEX: FGIPX (0) vs RMFEX (250). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.18 vs. FGIPX (-3.48). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 56.67 vs. FGIPX (38.94).
| FGIPX | RMFEX | FGIPX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.62 | 124% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.62 | 124% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.013 | -1.167 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.32B | 97.3B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.32 | 1.61 | 144% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.48 | 4.18 | -83% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.54 | 10.64 | 61% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.94 | 56.67 | 69% |
| Returns for 10 years | -27.99 | 61.98 | -45% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...