Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGIPX vs RMFEX
FGIPX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts FGIPX vs RMFEX
Macquarie Growth and Income Instl
Price$16.26
Change-$0.08 (-0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.47B
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$60.46
Change-$0.15 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.9B
FGIPX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGIPX vs. RMFEX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGIPX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 110B vs. FGIPX (1.47B). FGIPX pays higher dividends than RMFEX: FGIPX (2.11) vs RMFEX (1.51). FGIPX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: FGIPX (12 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). FGIPX (0.77) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). FGIPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). FGIPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFEX: FGIPX (0) vs RMFEX (250). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.10 vs. FGIPX (7.08). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 57.34 vs. FGIPX (44.26).
| FGIPX | RMFEX | FGIPX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.62 | 124% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.62 | 124% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.163 | 10.922 | 121% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.47B | 110B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.11 | 1.51 | 140% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.08 | 8.10 | 87% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.07 | 23.84 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.26 | 57.34 | 77% |
| Returns for 10 years | -14.68 | 86.04 | -17% |