Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGIPX vs RMFEX
FGIPX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts FGIPX vs RMFEX
Macquarie Growth and Income Instl
Price$17.01
Change-$0.01 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.5B
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$62.60
Change+$0.12 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets112.6B
FGIPX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGIPX vs. RMFEX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGIPX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 113B vs. FGIPX (1.5B). FGIPX pays higher dividends than RMFEX: FGIPX (1.91) vs RMFEX (1.46). FGIPX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: FGIPX (13 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). FGIPX (0.77) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). FGIPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). FGIPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFEX: FGIPX (0) vs RMFEX (250). FGIPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.67 vs. RMFEX (8.19). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 61.35 vs. FGIPX (50.51).
| FGIPX | RMFEX | FGIPX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.62 | 124% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.62 | 124% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.029 | 15.248 | 125% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.5B | 113B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.91 | 1.46 | 131% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.67 | 8.19 | 106% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.89 | 45.24 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.51 | 61.35 | 82% |
| Returns for 10 years | -6.26 | 102.04 | -6% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement