Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGIPX vs RMFEX
FGIPX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts FGIPX vs RMFEX
Macquarie Growth and Income Instl
Price$16.16
Change+$0.10 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.48B
American Funds American Mutual R4
Price$60.79
Change+$0.27 (+0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.54B
FGIPX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGIPX vs. RMFEX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGIPX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. FGIPX (1.48B). FGIPX pays higher dividends than RMFEX: FGIPX (2.10) vs RMFEX (1.53). FGIPX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: FGIPX (12 years) vs RMFEX (23 years). FGIPX (0.77) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). FGIPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. RMFEX (31.00). FGIPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMFEX: FGIPX (0) vs RMFEX (250). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.74 vs. FGIPX (6.35). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 62.99 vs. FGIPX (46.83).
| FGIPX | RMFEX | FGIPX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.62 | 124% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.62 | 124% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.467 | 11.527 | 108% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.48B | 111B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.10 | 1.53 | 137% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.35 | 11.74 | 54% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.91 | 32.08 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.83 | 62.99 | 74% |
| Returns for 10 years | -15.05 | 88.96 | -17% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement