Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGJMX vs FTUCX
FGJMX vs FTUCX Comparison
Open Charts FGJMX vs FTUCX
Fidelity Advisor Communication ServicesI
Price$137.76
Change+$3.24 (+2.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.26B
Fidelity Advisor Telecommunications C
Price$60.50
Change-$0.28 (-0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets248.86M
FGJMX vs FTUCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGJMX vs. FTUCX commentary
Sep 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGJMX is a Buy and FTUCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FGJMX has more cash in the bank: 2.26B vs. FTUCX (249M). FTUCX pays higher dividends than FGJMX: FTUCX (1.02) vs FGJMX (0.00). FGJMX was incepted earlier than FTUCX: FGJMX (7 years) vs FTUCX (19 years). FTUCX (1.80) is less costly to investors than FGJMX (0.71). FGJMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. FTUCX (40.00). FGJMX (0) and FTUCX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FGJMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 36.68 vs. FTUCX (21.13). FGJMX return over 5 years is better than : 81.37 vs. FTUCX (-3.33).
| FGJMX | FTUCX | FGJMX / FTUCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 1.80 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 1.80 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.949 | 13.745 | 152% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 500 | - |
| Net Assets | 2.26B | 249M | 906% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.02 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 36.68 | 21.13 | 174% |
| Returns for 3 years | 113.73 | 36.95 | 308% |
| Returns for 5 years | 81.37 | -3.33 | -2,442% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 12.00 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers