Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGKMX vs FTUAX
FGKMX vs FTUAX Comparison
Open Charts FGKMX vs FTUAX
Fidelity Advisor Communication ServicesZ
Price$135.58
Change-$0.21 (-0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.14B
Fidelity Advisor Telecommunications A
Price$61.51
Change+$0.71 (+1.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets250.42M
FGKMX vs FTUAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGKMX vs. FTUAX commentary
Aug 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGKMX is a StrongBuy and FTUAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FGKMX has more cash in the bank: 2.14B vs. FTUAX (250M). FTUAX pays higher dividends than FGKMX: FTUAX (1.81) vs FGKMX (0.00). FGKMX was incepted earlier than FTUAX: FGKMX (7 years) vs FTUAX (19 years). FTUAX (1.05) is less costly to investors than FGKMX (0.58). FGKMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. FTUAX (40.00). FGKMX (0) and FTUAX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FGKMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 34.01 vs. FTUAX (22.56). FGKMX return over 5 years is better than : 76.63 vs. FTUAX (-1.97).
| FGKMX | FTUAX | FGKMX / FTUAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 1.05 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 1.05 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.360 | 14.061 | 152% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 500 | - |
| Net Assets | 2.14B | 250M | 856% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.81 | 0% |
| Returns for 1 year | 34.01 | 22.56 | 151% |
| Returns for 3 years | 110.20 | 33.82 | 326% |
| Returns for 5 years | 76.63 | -1.97 | -3,892% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 13.77 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers