Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGKMX vs FTUCX
FGKMX vs FTUCX Comparison
Open Charts FGKMX vs FTUCX
Fidelity Advisor Communication ServicesZ
Price$132.24
Change-$1.34 (-1.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.14B
Fidelity Advisor Telecommunications C
Price$58.51
Change-$0.65 (-1.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets250.42M
FGKMX vs FTUCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGKMX vs. FTUCX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGKMX is a StrongBuy and FTUCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FGKMX has more cash in the bank: 2.14B vs. FTUCX (250M). FTUCX pays higher dividends than FGKMX: FTUCX (1.05) vs FGKMX (0.00). FGKMX was incepted earlier than FTUCX: FGKMX (7 years) vs FTUCX (19 years). FTUCX (1.80) is less costly to investors than FGKMX (0.58). FGKMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. FTUCX (40.00). FGKMX (0) and FTUCX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FGKMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 39.29 vs. FTUCX (19.15). FGKMX return over 5 years is better than : 82.24 vs. FTUCX (-7.64).
| FGKMX | FTUCX | FGKMX / FTUCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 1.80 | 32% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 1.80 | 32% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.385 | 10.713 | 181% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 500 | - |
| Net Assets | 2.14B | 250M | 856% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.05 | 0% |
| Returns for 1 year | 39.29 | 19.15 | 205% |
| Returns for 3 years | 97.72 | 24.51 | 399% |
| Returns for 5 years | 82.24 | -7.64 | -1,076% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 2.35 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers