Ad is loading...
FGKMX vs FTUTX
FGKMX vs FTUTX Comparison
Open Charts FGKMX vs FTUTX
Fidelity Advisor Communication ServicesZ
Price$107.70
Change+$0.92 (+0.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.58B
Fidelity Advisor Telecommunications M
Price$54.85
Change-$0.87 (-1.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets260.9M
FGKMX vs FTUTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGKMX vs. FTUTX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGKMX is a StrongBuy and FTUTX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FGKMX has more cash in the bank: 1.58B vs. FTUTX (261M). FTUTX pays higher dividends than FGKMX: FTUTX (1.68) vs FGKMX (0.00). FGKMX was incepted earlier than FTUTX: FGKMX (6 years) vs FTUTX (18 years). FTUTX (1.30) is less costly to investors than FGKMX (0.58). FGKMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. FTUTX (40.00). FGKMX (0) and FTUTX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FTUTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.46 vs. FGKMX (8.11). FGKMX return over 5 years is better than : 71.81 vs. FTUTX (-0.48).
| FGKMX | FTUTX | FGKMX / FTUTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 1.30 | 45% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 1.30 | 45% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.567 | 4.766 | -96% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 500 | - |
| Net Assets | 1.58B | 261M | 606% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.68 | 0% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.11 | 30.46 | 27% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.57 | 18.26 | 348% |
| Returns for 5 years | 71.81 | -0.48 | -15,062% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -2.00 | - |