FGMCU
Price
$10.07
Change
+$0.01 (+0.10%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
RRACF
Price
$12.64
Change
+$0.02 (+0.16%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
358.22M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FGMCU vs RRACF

Header iconFGMCU vs RRACF Comparison
Open Charts FGMCU vs RRACFBanner chart's image
FG Merger II
Price$10.07
Change+$0.01 (+0.10%)
Volume$3.4K
CapitalizationN/A
Rigel Resource Acquisition
Price$12.64
Change+$0.02 (+0.16%)
Volume$566
Capitalization358.22M
FGMCU vs RRACF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FGMCU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RRACF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FGMCU vs. RRACF commentary
Jul 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGMCU is a Buy and RRACF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 05, 2025
Stock price -- (FGMCU: $10.07 vs. RRACF: $12.64)
Brand notoriety: FGMCU and RRACF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FGMCU: 18% vs. RRACF: 53%
Market capitalization -- FGMCU: $0 vs. RRACF: $358.22M
FGMCU [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $0. RRACF’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $358.22M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $4.72B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FGMCU’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRRACF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FGMCU’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • RRACF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FGMCU is a better buy in the long-term than RRACF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FGMCU’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RRACF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FGMCU’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • RRACF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RRACF is a better buy in the short-term than FGMCU.

Price Growth

FGMCU (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а -0.10% price change this week, while RRACF (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was +0.16% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was -1.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.69%.

Reported Earning Dates

FGMCU is expected to report earnings on Apr 30, 2025.

RRACF is expected to report earnings on May 15, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (-1.49% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FGMCU (-2.41M) and RRACF (-2.45M) have comparable annual earnings (EBITDA) . RRACF has more cash in the bank: 70.7K vs. FGMCU (6.28K). FGMCU has less debt than RRACF: FGMCU (845K) vs RRACF (5.56M). FGMCU (0) and RRACF (0) have equivalent revenues.
FGMCURRACFFGMCU / RRACF
CapitalizationN/A358M-
EBITDA-2.41M-2.45M98%
Gain YTDN/A9.913-
P/E RatioN/A53.19-
Revenue00-
Total Cash6.28K70.7K9%
Total Debt845K5.56M15%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FGMCURRACF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
8%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
2%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
5%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
4%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
7%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
6%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
6%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
10%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
5%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
15%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
25%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
13%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
32%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
7%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
14%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FGMCU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RRACF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OAZBX37.470.06
+0.16%
Oakmark Equity and Income R6
NMMEX17.09N/A
N/A
Northern Active M Emerging Market Equity
OMSYX30.13N/A
N/A
Invesco Main Street All Cap Y
HUMEX16.04N/A
N/A
Huber Mid Cap Value Instl
ARYEX26.35N/A
N/A
American Century Real Estate Y

FGMCU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FGMCU has been loosely correlated with IRRX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FGMCU jumps, then IRRX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FGMCU
1D Price
Change %
FGMCU100%
+0.10%
IRRX - FGMCU
50%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CSLUF - FGMCU
44%
Loosely correlated
N/A
BEEP - FGMCU
33%
Poorly correlated
+0.88%
CXAI - FGMCU
27%
Poorly correlated
+1.94%
CSTAF - FGMCU
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More