FGPR
Price
$10.45
Change
+$1.87 (+21.79%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
215.27M
TOIPF
Price
$1.00
Change
-$0.01 (-0.99%)
Updated
Apr 2 closing price
Capitalization
3.34B
Interact to see
Advertisement

FGPR vs TOIPF

Header iconFGPR vs TOIPF Comparison
Open Charts FGPR vs TOIPFBanner chart's image
Ferrellgas Partners
Price$10.45
Change+$1.87 (+21.79%)
Volume$605
Capitalization215.27M
Thai Oil Public
Price$1.00
Change-$0.01 (-0.99%)
Volume$6.5K
Capitalization3.34B
FGPR vs TOIPF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FGPR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TOIPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FGPR vs. TOIPF commentary
Jul 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGPR is a StrongBuy and TOIPF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 04, 2025
Stock price -- (FGPR: $10.45 vs. TOIPF: $1.00)
Brand notoriety: FGPR and TOIPF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oil Refining/Marketing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FGPR: 18% vs. TOIPF: 100%
Market capitalization -- FGPR: $215.27M vs. TOIPF: $3.34B
FGPR [@Oil Refining/Marketing] is valued at $215.27M. TOIPF’s [@Oil Refining/Marketing] market capitalization is $3.34B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil Refining/Marketing] industry ranges from $73.66B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil Refining/Marketing] industry is $8.79B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FGPR’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTOIPF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FGPR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TOIPF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, TOIPF is a better buy in the long-term than FGPR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FGPR’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TOIPF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FGPR’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • TOIPF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FGPR is a better buy in the short-term than TOIPF.

Price Growth

FGPR (@Oil Refining/Marketing) experienced а +5.88% price change this week, while TOIPF (@Oil Refining/Marketing) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil Refining/Marketing industry was +2.59%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.45%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.95%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil Refining/Marketing (+2.59% weekly)

The Oil Refining/Marketing segment includes companies that refine crude oil into a number of petroleum products, including gasoline, jet fuel and diesel, and then sell the usable products to the end users. These companies are involved in what’s called downstream operations in the oil business. They also engage in the marketing and distribution of crude oil and natural gas products. In other words, the downstream oil and gas business is focused on post-production processes of crude oil and natural gas. When oil prices slump, downstream businesses are hurt less or in some cases even benefit, since their purchase cost of crude oil goes down. Some of the biggest U.S. oil refining/marketing companies include Phillips 66, Marathon Petroleum Corporation and Valero Energy Corp.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TOIPF($3.34B) has a higher market cap than FGPR($215M). FGPR YTD gains are higher at: 31.612 vs. TOIPF (-1.426). TOIPF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 51.1B vs. FGPR (341M). TOIPF has more cash in the bank: 47.1B vs. FGPR (93.5M). FGPR has less debt than TOIPF: FGPR (1.52B) vs TOIPF (183B). TOIPF has higher revenues than FGPR: TOIPF (507B) vs FGPR (2.07B).
FGPRTOIPFFGPR / TOIPF
Capitalization215M3.34B6%
EBITDA341M51.1B1%
Gain YTD31.612-1.426-2,217%
P/E RatioN/A3.15-
Revenue2.07B507B0%
Total Cash93.5M47.1B0%
Total Debt1.52B183B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FGPR vs TOIPF: Fundamental Ratings
FGPR
TOIPF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2241
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
79
Overvalued
28
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
94100
SMR RATING
1..100
10079
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6476
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7113
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TOIPF's Valuation (28) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FGPR (79). This means that TOIPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FGPR’s over the last 12 months.

FGPR's Profit vs Risk Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as TOIPF (100). This means that FGPR’s stock grew similarly to TOIPF’s over the last 12 months.

TOIPF's SMR Rating (79) in the null industry is in the same range as FGPR (100). This means that TOIPF’s stock grew similarly to FGPR’s over the last 12 months.

FGPR's Price Growth Rating (64) in the null industry is in the same range as TOIPF (76). This means that FGPR’s stock grew similarly to TOIPF’s over the last 12 months.

TOIPF's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FGPR (71). This means that TOIPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FGPR’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FGPRTOIPF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
10%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
11%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FGPR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TOIPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PRZIX37.89N/A
N/A
T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Stock I
FACPX41.45N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Consumer Discret M
IMCVX9.68N/A
N/A
Voya Multi-Manager Mid Cap Value I
PKAPX14.00N/A
N/A
PIMCO RAE US I-2
CMIRX8.66N/A
N/A
Conestoga Discovery Institutional

FGPR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FGPR and FGPRB have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FGPR and FGPRB's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FGPR
1D Price
Change %
FGPR100%
+21.79%
FGPRB - FGPR
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CSAN - FGPR
12%
Poorly correlated
+2.14%
DINO - FGPR
2%
Poorly correlated
+1.38%
MOHCF - FGPR
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CTXAY - FGPR
1%
Poorly correlated
-0.24%
More

TOIPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TOIPF and CSAN have been poorly correlated (+4% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TOIPF and CSAN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TOIPF
1D Price
Change %
TOIPF100%
N/A
CSAN - TOIPF
4%
Poorly correlated
+2.14%
MOHCF - TOIPF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FGPR - TOIPF
0%
Poorly correlated
+21.79%
LCNTU - TOIPF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PKCPY - TOIPF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More