Advertisement
FGROF vs GNGYF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGROF is a Buy and GNGYF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FGROF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileGNGYF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- FGROF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- GNGYF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GNGYF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- GNGYF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 1 bearish.
Price Growth
FGROF (@Railroads) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while GNGYF (@Railroads) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Railroads industry was -0.93%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.01%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Railroads (-0.93% weekly)The Railroad industry includes passenger and freight transportation services along rail lines. This also includes companies that provide maintenance and switching duties as part of rail services. Within North America, the industry is largely dominated by some large operators. Several short-line railroads serve regional and local routes. Union Pacific Corporation, Canadian National Railway Company, and CSX Corporation are some of the prominent names in the business. The railroad business is relatively cyclical; economic expansion boost the freight services in particular, while economic stagnation often dampens transportation demand.
| FGROF | GNGYF | FGROF / GNGYF | |
| Capitalization | 1.58B | 3.09B | 51% |
| EBITDA | 811M | 1.39B | 58% |
| Gain YTD | 61.670 | 42.857 | 144% |
| P/E Ratio | 10.39 | 16.08 | 65% |
| Revenue | 4.4B | 27.4B | 16% |
| Total Cash | 437M | 2.34B | 19% |
| Total Debt | 1.4B | 1.9B | 74% |
FGROF | GNGYF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 49 | 48 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 22 Undervalued | 57 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 8 | 35 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 79 | 87 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 43 | 38 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 36 | 12 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FGROF's Valuation (22) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GNGYF (57). This means that FGROF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GNGYF’s over the last 12 months.
FGROF's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the null industry is in the same range as GNGYF (35). This means that FGROF’s stock grew similarly to GNGYF’s over the last 12 months.
FGROF's SMR Rating (79) in the null industry is in the same range as GNGYF (87). This means that FGROF’s stock grew similarly to GNGYF’s over the last 12 months.
GNGYF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as FGROF (43). This means that GNGYF’s stock grew similarly to FGROF’s over the last 12 months.
GNGYF's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the null industry is in the same range as FGROF (36). This means that GNGYF’s stock grew similarly to FGROF’s over the last 12 months.
| FGROF | GNGYF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 60% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 49% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 46% | 2 days ago 59% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 45% | 2 days ago 59% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 68% |
Advertisement
FGROF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that FGROF and EJPRY have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FGROF and EJPRY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FGROF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FGROF | 100% | N/A | ||
| EJPRY - FGROF | 10% Poorly correlated | -0.24% | ||
| JFBHF - FGROF | 9% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| GRPTF - FGROF | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| MTRJF - FGROF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| FGROY - FGROF | -1% Poorly correlated | -14.84% | ||
More | ||||
GNGYF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that GNGYF and MTRJF have been poorly correlated (+1% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GNGYF and MTRJF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GNGYF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GNGYF | 100% | N/A | ||
| MTRJF - GNGYF | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| JFBHF - GNGYF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| MTCPY - GNGYF | -0% Poorly correlated | -0.71% | ||
| FGROF - GNGYF | -1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| GRPTF - GNGYF | -2% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||