Ad is loading...
FGSAX vs PMBPX
FGSAX vs PMBPX Comparison
Open Charts FGSAX vs PMBPX
Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth A
Price$58.00
Change-$0.08 (-0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.21B
FGSAX vs PMBPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGSAX vs. PMBPX commentary
May 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGSAX is a Buy and PMBPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMBPX has more cash in the bank: 30.4B vs. FGSAX (3.21B). PMBPX pays higher dividends than FGSAX: PMBPX (0.01) vs FGSAX (0.00). FGSAX was incepted earlier than PMBPX: FGSAX (41 years) vs PMBPX (24 years). FGSAX (1.27) is less costly to investors than PMBPX (0.83). FGSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. PMBPX (10.50). PMBPX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGSAX: PMBPX (0) vs FGSAX (1500). FGSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.91 vs. PMBPX (8.61). PMBPX return over 5 years is better than : 65.77 vs. FGSAX (54.42).
| FGSAX | PMBPX | FGSAX / PMBPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.83 | 139% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 0.83 | 153% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.450 | 1.680 | 27% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.21B | 30.4B | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.01 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.91 | 8.61 | 185% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.15 | 41.65 | 152% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.42 | 65.77 | 83% |
| Returns for 10 years | 28.89 | 92.95 | 31% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...