Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGSAX vs PMBPX
FGSAX vs PMBPX Comparison
Open Charts FGSAX vs PMBPX
Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth A
Price$63.05
Change+$0.23 (+0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.21B
FGSAX vs PMBPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGSAX vs. PMBPX commentary
Jul 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGSAX is a Buy and PMBPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMBPX has more cash in the bank: 31.8B vs. FGSAX (4.21B). PMBPX pays higher dividends than FGSAX: PMBPX (0.01) vs FGSAX (0.00). FGSAX was incepted earlier than PMBPX: FGSAX (41 years) vs PMBPX (25 years). FGSAX (1.27) is less costly to investors than PMBPX (0.83). FGSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. PMBPX (10.50). PMBPX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGSAX: PMBPX (0) vs FGSAX (1500). FGSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.77 vs. PMBPX (7.64). PMBPX return over 5 years is better than : 51.07 vs. FGSAX (44.78).
| FGSAX | PMBPX | FGSAX / PMBPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.83 | 139% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.27 | 0.83 | 153% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.798 | 4.763 | 185% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.21B | 31.8B | 13% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.01 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.77 | 7.64 | 285% |
| Returns for 3 years | 79.28 | 48.51 | 163% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.78 | 51.07 | 88% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.53 | 96.92 | 41% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement