Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGSCX vs FSMAX
FGSCX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts FGSCX vs FSMAX
Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth C
Price$28.38
Change+$0.34 (+1.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.65B
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$99.75
Change+$0.63 (+0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.63B
FGSCX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGSCX vs. FSMAX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGSCX is a Buy and FSMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 39.6B vs. FGSCX (4.65B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than FGSCX: FSMAX (0.46) vs FGSCX (0.00). FGSCX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: FGSCX (30 years) vs FSMAX (14 years). FGSCX (1.98) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). FGSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGSCX: FSMAX (0) vs FGSCX (1500). FGSCX (18.16) and FSMAX (17.59) have marching annual gain over last year. FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 52.77 vs. FGSCX (-2.06).
| FGSCX | FSMAX | FGSCX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 0.04 | 5,571% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.98 | 0.04 | 5,657% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.182 | 9.067 | 123% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.65B | 39.6B | 12% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.46 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.16 | 17.59 | 103% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.79 | 48.67 | 119% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.06 | 52.77 | -4% |
| Returns for 10 years | -18.16 | 100.52 | -18% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers