Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGSCX vs FSMAX
FGSCX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts FGSCX vs FSMAX
Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth C
Price$27.59
Change+$0.35 (+1.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.05B
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$92.17
Change+$1.25 (+1.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets37.61B
FGSCX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGSCX vs. FSMAX commentary
Jun 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGSCX is a Buy and FSMAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 37.6B vs. FGSCX (4.05B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than FGSCX: FSMAX (0.50) vs FGSCX (0.00). FGSCX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: FGSCX (30 years) vs FSMAX (14 years). FGSCX (1.98) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). FGSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGSCX: FSMAX (0) vs FGSCX (1500). FGSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.28 vs. FSMAX (14.57). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 64.38 vs. FGSCX (7.46).
| FGSCX | FSMAX | FGSCX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 0.04 | 5,571% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.98 | 0.04 | 5,657% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.010 | 0.044 | 18,197% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.05B | 37.6B | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.50 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.28 | 14.57 | 125% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.27 | 43.69 | 131% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.46 | 64.38 | 12% |
| Returns for 10 years | -23.78 | 73.79 | -32% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement