Ad is loading...
FGSCX vs FSMAX
FGSCX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts FGSCX vs FSMAX
Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth C
Price$26.34
Change+$0.13 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.57B
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$94.51
Change+$0.64 (+0.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets40.78B
FGSCX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGSCX vs. FSMAX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGSCX is a Hold and FSMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.8B vs. FGSCX (2.57B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than FGSCX: FSMAX (1.10) vs FGSCX (0.00). FGSCX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: FGSCX (29 years) vs FSMAX (13 years). FGSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 142.00 vs. FSMAX (18.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGSCX: FSMAX (0) vs FGSCX (1500). FSMAX (26.14) and FGSCX (25.43) have marching annual gain over last year. FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 48.39 vs. FGSCX (1.66).
| FGSCX | FSMAX | FGSCX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.441 | 3.994 | 111% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.57B | 40.8B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.10 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.43 | 26.14 | 97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.99 | 21.40 | 135% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.66 | 48.39 | 3% |
| Returns for 10 years | -23.14 | 90.18 | -26% |