Ad is loading...
FGSCX vs FSMAX
FGSCX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts FGSCX vs FSMAX
Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth C
Price$22.27
Change+$0.23 (+1.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.65B
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$77.15
Change+$1.14 (+1.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets36.55B
FGSCX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGSCX vs. FSMAX commentary
Apr 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGSCX is a Buy and FSMAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 36.5B vs. FGSCX (2.65B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than FGSCX: FSMAX (0.53) vs FGSCX (0.00). FGSCX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: FGSCX (30 years) vs FSMAX (14 years). FGSCX (1.98) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). FGSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGSCX: FSMAX (0) vs FGSCX (1500). FSMAX (-4.48) and FGSCX (-4.54) have marching annual gain over last year. FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 62.31 vs. FGSCX (4.85).
| FGSCX | FSMAX | FGSCX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 0.04 | 5,571% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.98 | 0.04 | 5,657% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -11.697 | -15.108 | 77% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.65B | 36.5B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.53 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.54 | -4.48 | 101% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.33 | 5.50 | 242% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.85 | 62.31 | 8% |
| Returns for 10 years | -39.07 | 44.65 | -88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...