Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGSCX vs FSMAX
FGSCX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts FGSCX vs FSMAX
Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth C
Price$27.81
Change+$0.12 (+0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.28B
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$95.57
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.17B
FGSCX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGSCX vs. FSMAX commentary
Jul 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGSCX is a Buy and FSMAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 39.2B vs. FGSCX (4.28B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than FGSCX: FSMAX (0.47) vs FGSCX (0.00). FGSCX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: FGSCX (30 years) vs FSMAX (14 years). FGSCX (1.98) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). FGSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FGSCX: FSMAX (0) vs FGSCX (1500). FGSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.05 vs. FSMAX (12.57). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 59.70 vs. FGSCX (1.84).
| FGSCX | FSMAX | FGSCX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 0.04 | 5,571% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.98 | 0.04 | 5,657% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.794 | 5.161 | 190% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.28B | 39.2B | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.47 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.05 | 12.57 | 152% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.02 | 54.50 | 119% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.84 | 59.70 | 3% |
| Returns for 10 years | -23.93 | 80.30 | -30% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement